Perceptions on life in Denver's revitalized Cole Neighborhood, as written by a new-ish resident and homeowner. NOT AFFILIATED IN ANY WAY WITH THE COLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION
Showing posts with label Cole Neighborhood Association. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cole Neighborhood Association. Show all posts
Sunday, July 27, 2008
I'm baaaaack...
After a six month hiatus, the Cole Neighborhood Memoirs is back.It's 11PM and I type as this speak as yet another crack head leaves the house across the street from mine.I took this blog down a few months ago because I grew tired of the constant criticisms from civil libertarians, whiners, and others that in my opinion take things far too seriously, portraying me and my views as narrow minded, racist, and overly negative about my Denver block and the Cole neighborhood in general.What I didn't anticipate was the word-of-mouth feedback that I have since responded and made it clear that I had more of an audience than I thought--And that I'm not the only one that simultaneously sees beauty, tragedy, potential, and humour in being a white resident in a largely black and hispanic, gentrifying neighborhood in urban Denver.Let's get some things straight for starters--I'm white and a college graduate (though I use that term loosely, since I hold a "degree" in liberal arts, which doesn't guarantee me any job but one at Starbucks or doing door-to-door sales for the local cable company) and I don't claim to have all the answers. I don't know what it's like to be a black or a hispanic in today's United States of America. I believe that while racial profiling and discrimination still exists today in Denver's police department (and elsewhere), I firmly believe that most of our police officers try to do their best in a very difficult job and an equally complex political environment. So if you're one of those folks that thinks that the Denver Police Department as a whole is a racist organization, don't bother posting comments, and move on to another site--You and I will never see eye-to-eye.I also see the future of Cole as one of cultural and economic diversity--That means we need more affluent residents to take an interest in and invest in Cole to make it a safer, more vibrant neighborhood.What is the purpose of this blog? Quite simply, to portray what living in this neighborhood is like for a resident of my "demographic". In the previous iteration of this site I admittedly found myself pandering hopelessly to those of opposing viewpoints--I didn't know whether I should speak my mind, convey current events in the neighborhood, or simply say what the "masses" thought should be said.No more. I'm happy to say that the Cole Neighborhood Association has enjoyed a regenesis of late, and as such, if you just want to become involved in the neighborhood, or learn what is new here, you have another source of information. What you'll read here is just my two cents, right or wrong. Sometimes funny, sometimes sad, often useless, but it will always reflect what I see as the most accurate portrayal of life here from the eyes of a white guy from rural Michigan.Will I say some controversial things? Guaranteed I will. Don't like it? You don't have to read it. Have a comment? By all means share it, I may learn something from you. But if you're just out to be negative, or to flame me for having an opinion, don't bother.Like my point-of-view or not, I am invested in and committed to this neighborhood, and ensuring its progress. For those like me, and for those unlike me, but that are responsible and similarly committed to making it a great place to live (more on that later).Thanks in advance for reading.
Friday, November 02, 2007
New life for the Cole Neighborhood Association?
I got an encouraging email that I thought I should share on this site--It's from one of the new leaders of the Cole Neighborhood Association. I have been involved with the association in the past, but over time grew a bit frustrated at the lack of action--We always seemed to be long on talk about what we "should do" but never actually organizing any sort of true action. At some point I determined that I could get more done spending that hour on the phone with the city inspectors and/or police department to handle some action items in the neighborhood, than attending the meetings. A shame, but true. No doubt I should have stuck it out and been a more vocal and active member.
Now just to backtrack--A lot of credit for the association has to go to Loralie Cole, who used to run the association. Even as a busy mother and teacher, she poured countless hours into the organization. I know first-hand that it is a thankless job leading an all-volunteer organization, and she deserves a tremendous amount of credit for keeping the association alive.
I just think that with any organization, new blood is lifeblood, and am thrilled to see that there are new, equally engaged people participating. Hopefully Loralie will still be involved in some way to finally realize the fruits of her long, largely unrecognized labors. Thanks again, Loralie.
It will be interesting in what direction the association heads now. In the past, it seemed very conflicted about "the mission statement" and goals of the organization. Pro or anti redevelopment? How much effort should be spent trying to get largely apathetic neighborhood residents to participate? Can decisions that affect the entire neighborhood be made when the only active Association members are largely white middle-class residents?
Regardless, this email is very encouraging, and I hope it speaks for a new direction for our neighborhood. Sounds like it's time for me to plug in again. So here's the info:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wanted to inform you that the Cole Neighborhood Association will be holding a mid-month planning meeting on Nov. 8 from 6:00 - 7:30 p.m. at 3280 Downing, US Bank Community Room. The main purpose of the meeting is to set a Strategic Plan for the CNA. EVERYONE is invitied and encouraged to attend!! This is an ideal opportunity and an exciting time to get involved; share your voice and help shape the future of the CNA. If you haven't come to a meeting in awhile, we'd love to see you on the 8th!
We decided to schedule this meeting because during our regularly scheduled monthly meeting on Thursday, Nov. 29th from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. we will be having the CNA Holiday Party . More about the party at the end of this e-mail.
Details regarding the Strategic Plan:
(The first hour of the meeting will be dedicated to the Strategic Plan)
At our last meeting on Oct. 25, The Economic Development subcommittee presented a Strategic Planning questionaire consisting of the following questions:
1. Why do we exist?
2. What is our vision for Cole Neighborhood?
3. What is our mission statement?
We decided that the goal for the planning meeting would be to answer these questions, after we all answer them for ourselves at home prior to the meeting. Now, all of you can do the same. In addition to these questions, we would like to address the Needs, Goals and Strategies for the Cole neighborhood.
What needs do we see in our community that we would like to address?
What are our goals in light of those needs?
What strategies do we need to develop to accomplish our goals?
For these questions, we'd like to begin brainstorming by writing down any and all ideas that come to mind. Then, at the Holiday Party, we'll ask everyone to help prioritize the list so that we can set a plan of action.
Please start brainstorming today and bring your thoughts and ideas to the meeting on the 8th. A Microsoft Word document with the questions is attached.
Details about the CNA Holiday Party, Nov. 29th, 6:00 - 8:00 pm.
(after a quick break, we'll use the last 20 min of the mtg to plan the party)
Again, we'd like as much participation as possible so that we can make our Holiday party a success. Items to be planned:
Food and Drink
Content for a flyer
Flyer Distribution
Activities for the evening, etc.
We hope to see everyone, and your neighbor, at both of these events. Start spreading the word today!
Best,
Sarah Shultz
Communications Subcommittee
Cole Neighborhood Association
Now just to backtrack--A lot of credit for the association has to go to Loralie Cole, who used to run the association. Even as a busy mother and teacher, she poured countless hours into the organization. I know first-hand that it is a thankless job leading an all-volunteer organization, and she deserves a tremendous amount of credit for keeping the association alive.
I just think that with any organization, new blood is lifeblood, and am thrilled to see that there are new, equally engaged people participating. Hopefully Loralie will still be involved in some way to finally realize the fruits of her long, largely unrecognized labors. Thanks again, Loralie.
It will be interesting in what direction the association heads now. In the past, it seemed very conflicted about "the mission statement" and goals of the organization. Pro or anti redevelopment? How much effort should be spent trying to get largely apathetic neighborhood residents to participate? Can decisions that affect the entire neighborhood be made when the only active Association members are largely white middle-class residents?
Regardless, this email is very encouraging, and I hope it speaks for a new direction for our neighborhood. Sounds like it's time for me to plug in again. So here's the info:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wanted to inform you that the Cole Neighborhood Association will be holding a mid-month planning meeting on Nov. 8 from 6:00 - 7:30 p.m. at 3280 Downing, US Bank Community Room. The main purpose of the meeting is to set a Strategic Plan for the CNA. EVERYONE is invitied and encouraged to attend!! This is an ideal opportunity and an exciting time to get involved; share your voice and help shape the future of the CNA. If you haven't come to a meeting in awhile, we'd love to see you on the 8th!
We decided to schedule this meeting because during our regularly scheduled monthly meeting on Thursday, Nov. 29th from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. we will be having the CNA Holiday Party . More about the party at the end of this e-mail.
Details regarding the Strategic Plan:
(The first hour of the meeting will be dedicated to the Strategic Plan)
At our last meeting on Oct. 25, The Economic Development subcommittee presented a Strategic Planning questionaire consisting of the following questions:
1. Why do we exist?
2. What is our vision for Cole Neighborhood?
3. What is our mission statement?
We decided that the goal for the planning meeting would be to answer these questions, after we all answer them for ourselves at home prior to the meeting. Now, all of you can do the same. In addition to these questions, we would like to address the Needs, Goals and Strategies for the Cole neighborhood.
What needs do we see in our community that we would like to address?
What are our goals in light of those needs?
What strategies do we need to develop to accomplish our goals?
For these questions, we'd like to begin brainstorming by writing down any and all ideas that come to mind. Then, at the Holiday Party, we'll ask everyone to help prioritize the list so that we can set a plan of action.
Please start brainstorming today and bring your thoughts and ideas to the meeting on the 8th. A Microsoft Word document with the questions is attached.
Details about the CNA Holiday Party, Nov. 29th, 6:00 - 8:00 pm.
(after a quick break, we'll use the last 20 min of the mtg to plan the party)
Again, we'd like as much participation as possible so that we can make our Holiday party a success. Items to be planned:
Food and Drink
Content for a flyer
Flyer Distribution
Activities for the evening, etc.
We hope to see everyone, and your neighbor, at both of these events. Start spreading the word today!
Best,
Sarah Shultz
Communications Subcommittee
Cole Neighborhood Association
Friday, April 06, 2007
Denver City Council District 8 Candidate Forum
From the recent Cole Neighborhood Association Meeting. Check the candidates out and you be the judge:
http://denverdirect.blogspot.com/2007/03/candidates-for-denver-city-council.html
Thanks go out to Denver Direct for putting these all together on one easy-to-find website/blog.
http://denverdirect.blogspot.com/2007/03/candidates-for-denver-city-council.html
Thanks go out to Denver Direct for putting these all together on one easy-to-find website/blog.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
A tiny bit of progress
I attended my first Cole Neighborhood Association Meeting last Thursday in almost a year. I had begun boycotting the meetings after my first, when it became clear that the only thing the attendees thought was an issue in the 'hood was gentrification.
Not crime, pollution or gangs, just finding a way to stop all the white people from moving in and driving property values up (by cleaning up the neighborhood, mind you). What trend do you think is more troubling--Violent crime, or raising property values?
I always knew that I should give it another try, and am ashamed it took me this long.
But there I was, at the meeting the other night, not knowing what to expect, but expecting the worst.
The truth? I was pleasantly surprised that rather being in the minority this time, we were in the majority. And by "we" I mean responsible residents that bought a home in this neighborhood as an investment, and as such know that the only way this investment is going to pay off is for the neighborhood to improve.
And by "we" I mean people that know that in order for the neighborhood to improve, there is a definite crime problem that needs to be addressed, and that it takes an aggressive police presence to get that done.
Last meeting, a woman actually stood up and said "This is a great neighborhood, we don't need such a police presence". This time I heard several residents stand up and talk about their own problem houses on their blocks that were perpetuating the history of drugs, violence and theft that this "great neighborhood" had become known for in the past.
I was thrilled as well that several police officers from District 2 in Denver attended the meeting. Both because I appreciate their efforts on our behalf tremendously, and enjoyed the opportunity to shake their hands and say thanks. Also, because I know they stopped coming to the neighborhood association meetings in the past because they grew tired of the perpetual "cop-bashing" sessions the meetings often deteriorated into. This time they were greeted by a majority of attendees that were sincere in their appreciation for their efforts, and that were committed to doing their part to help the police continue to clean up this neighborhood.
After hearing of the problems some residents were having just a few blocks away from our home, I realized this was going to be a long process improving the neighborhood and pushing the problem individuals out. But with cooperation between realistic, reasonable residents like are beginning to get involved, and the police department, I believe we can do it.
Thanks for reading.
Not crime, pollution or gangs, just finding a way to stop all the white people from moving in and driving property values up (by cleaning up the neighborhood, mind you). What trend do you think is more troubling--Violent crime, or raising property values?
I always knew that I should give it another try, and am ashamed it took me this long.
But there I was, at the meeting the other night, not knowing what to expect, but expecting the worst.
The truth? I was pleasantly surprised that rather being in the minority this time, we were in the majority. And by "we" I mean responsible residents that bought a home in this neighborhood as an investment, and as such know that the only way this investment is going to pay off is for the neighborhood to improve.
And by "we" I mean people that know that in order for the neighborhood to improve, there is a definite crime problem that needs to be addressed, and that it takes an aggressive police presence to get that done.
Last meeting, a woman actually stood up and said "This is a great neighborhood, we don't need such a police presence". This time I heard several residents stand up and talk about their own problem houses on their blocks that were perpetuating the history of drugs, violence and theft that this "great neighborhood" had become known for in the past.
I was thrilled as well that several police officers from District 2 in Denver attended the meeting. Both because I appreciate their efforts on our behalf tremendously, and enjoyed the opportunity to shake their hands and say thanks. Also, because I know they stopped coming to the neighborhood association meetings in the past because they grew tired of the perpetual "cop-bashing" sessions the meetings often deteriorated into. This time they were greeted by a majority of attendees that were sincere in their appreciation for their efforts, and that were committed to doing their part to help the police continue to clean up this neighborhood.
After hearing of the problems some residents were having just a few blocks away from our home, I realized this was going to be a long process improving the neighborhood and pushing the problem individuals out. But with cooperation between realistic, reasonable residents like are beginning to get involved, and the police department, I believe we can do it.
Thanks for reading.
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Gentrification in Cole--Good or bad?
I tagged along with Ashleigh to the Cole Neighborhood Association Meeting a couple weeks ago, and decided that some thoughts regarding the experience would make worthy material for this forum.
The meeting was called to discuss the proposed re-zoning of the Phillips Center, a commercial building near our home. The current owner, is considering selling the property to a developer that wants to re-zone it as mixed commercial and residential, and put in a mixture of apartments, lofts, and potentially, store fronts (think coffee!).
There were about 12 Cole residents present for this meeting, with a diversity commensurate with our neighborhood--A mixture of black, white, and hispanic, including one woman that didn't speak a lick of English.
Most of the discussion centered around the proposed usage of the building, and whether this renovation would potentially add or detract from the neighborhood. Most of the people in attendance were relatively positive about the proposed changes, as if done correctly, it could add much-needed local retail space, as well as take what is largely an industrial building and give it some additional curb appeal. It also could potentially draw even more responsible neighbors into the area in my opinion--But admittedly if the new developers do the right thing in their work. And heaven forbid if it would possibly help our homes grow in value.
What amazed me at this meeting, and has in a general sense since we've moved into the neighborhood, is some residents' fear of the inevitable gentrification of the neighborhood.
First up, what is gentrification? Dictionary.com defines it as:
"The restoration and upgrading of deteriorated urban property by middle-class or affluent people, often resulting in displacement of lower-income people."
For a more comprehensive account of gentrifications and it's origins, see:
http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/001671.html
In simple terms, some residents of the neighborhood, from what I can see, mostly African American and Hispanic, are afraid of developers, largely generalized as white people, coming into the neighborhood and fixing and "flipping" properties for a profit. Their concern seems to be that in renovating the neighborhood, higher-priced homes and structures will replace the lower-priced ones, drive property taxes up, and as a result, displace those that can't afford the higher taxes. In regards to the Phillips Center, it seems they're afraid that there is no guarantee that the re-development will in fact provide at least some low-income housing, accelerating, and contributing to, the displacement. I share their concern, though, I must admit, I'm more concerned about the development's future owners not screening and monitoring the rental units in the new structure more than anything--We have enough sketchy characters and "independent pharmaceutical reps" (a.k.a. drug dealers) in the neighborhood. I'd rather see a well-maintained, high-priced rental property than a poorly-run, poorly-maintained low-income housing property. (In all fairness, there are several multiple-family rental properties just north and east of our neighborhood on the way to Downtown Neighborhood that I think qualify as "low income" or Section 8 housing, and they're beautiful, well maintained by their residents, and a welcome addition to the neighborhood, so I have no problem with lower-income housing if it's done correctly).
What the current residents don't seem to comprehend about gentrification, however, is the "restoration and upgrading of deteriorated urban property" part. How is this a bad thing? Can somebody please tell me that?
I'm all for diversity, both cultural and architectural. I would hate for this neighborhood to get largely scraped and re-built ala what is happening on the border between Lodo and the Highlands. I also would hate to see the neighborhood get developed into an overpriced, urban-hipster-type area like Ballpark or even Stapleton has become. I personally have seen enough "lofts" to last me for the rest of my life. I love the taco stand on the corner of Bruce Randolph and Downing, less than a block from our home, as well as the small fruit and vegetable stand there. I love the street vendors selling helados and elote, and would hate to see that flavor lost.
I also would be a little disappointed if I saw an Evil Empire (Starbucks) pop up in the neighborhood instead of a Peaberry's (at least a Colorado company) or an independent coffee shop, but anything--ANYTHING would be better than the mix of ghetto liquor stores and Mexican clothing stores we have now. Yes, we have local shopping, as long as you want to by a 40 of King Cobra, a pair of shrink-wrapped boot cut jeans and a ten-gallon hat.
I apologize for that rant-ish digression: My point is, our neighborhood is clearly "deteriorated" and in need of "restoration and upgrading", and it seems to me that gentrification is the only way this is going to happen. There are more old homes in this neighborhood that are falling apart due to neglect as their are that have been lovingly restored. Personally, if the existing residents aren't going to fix them up, I say give someone else a chance. It's understandable to not be financially able to rebuild or completely renovate your house (God knows Ash and I can relate, as we're really scraping by to make this home-ownership thing fly) but we're just asking you to take the stair-climber off your porch, pick up a beer bottle and pull a weed once in a while. In other words, take some pride in your home, and your neighborhood.
Take us for example. Our house was owned by a drug dealer, and was in a terrible state of disrepair before the developers fixed it up and we purchased it. Since we've moved in, we've greened the grass, planted trees and flowers, and regularly pick up rubbish on our block. Heck, I pick up rubbish on OTHER PEOPLE'S BLOCKS. I would think that folks would be thrilled to have us here, rather than the previous owner.
However, for example, at this neighborhood meeting, The current owner of the building in question seemed to single out my wife and I as the deserving recipients of a soapbox tirade (not too far removed from a rant) about how much he has done for the neighborhood (honestly, which he has, but we're not the enemy here), and implying that it wasn't the place of someone who just moved in to question his motives and plans for selling and renovating the Center.
Another woman there, who lives a few blocks away in a bordering neighborhood, supported his feelings about newcomers, and, interestingly, commented that there was "too much police presence" and racial profiling in Cole and that we didn't need it as "this is a great neighborhood". (Let me say here that I will be the first to admit I have no idea what it is like to be an African American in Denver, and if the police racially profile. I'm sure it happens from time to time, and that is a shame in this day and age. But I would hope that even the most liberal African American would agree that an increased police presence, especially in this neighborhood, will reduce the drugs, and crime in general, and that is a good thing. I would also hope that they would at least consider the probability that the DPD as a whole has our best interest in mind--and like any other group or organization, there can be bad members that reflect poorly on an otherwise admirable whole.) Oops, tangent alert--Anyway, she made it clear that she resented the newcomers to the neighborhood as they (we) were diluting the diversity. Ironic, since as one of the few white couples in the 'hood, by moving in we actually are increasing the diversity--do the math folks. But anyway, my point here is that newcomers (we, basically) were portrayed almost like colonialist invaders or something. Reverse discrimination anyone? So what if Cole is a historically black neighborhood. Should that prevent us from moving in? Do you think it would fly if Thornton, a largely white suburb, discouraged blacks from moving in? It's not any different.
Bottom line, if the folks that are moving in are fixing it up and taking more pride in the neighborhood, and you're against these folks moving in, then you're against the neighborhood being fixed up. This is simple logic here folks (A=B, B=C, therefore, A=C; one of the few benefits of my liberal arts education). With this in mind, it seems pretty clear to me that there are in reality many residents here that are anti-progress, anti-revitalization, and would rather have the neighborhood remain run-down, trash-filled, and crime infested, which I find quite sad. Can anyone tell me why one would take low property taxes over living in a safer, cleaner, nicer neighborhood?
And don't try to convince me this neighborhood doesn't still have a ways to go. We still have a terrible trash problem, and still have the occasional gang banger and druggie pass through our overall very benign block. Unless residents want to drive these dirt-bags out, a vigilant police presence is essential. And whether it's trash, vandalism, drugs, or other crime, many of the long-time residents that still live here don't seem to care in my opinion. They still keep old furniture on their porches, drop trash and beer bottles in the street, look the other way when someone is selling crack on the corner, and don't maintain their homes.
If this is the diversity that we risk losing, I say let it happen. Yup, you can add me to your "most hated" list right below President Bush. It'll be hard, but I'll get over it.
I personally don't care whether the "gentrifiers" are black, white, Hispanic, Native American, whatever, as long as they care about the neighborhood and take some pride in ownership in their homes, they're welcome additions to me.
Unfortunately, in my opinion, too many minorities simplify the gentrification issue into a purely racial subject--Namely white people moving in and displacing blacks and hispanics. No doubt, in Denver, that's largely the case.
But that illustrates some sort of larger social question I guess--Namely, why aren't there more affluent blacks and hispanics moving into these urban neighborhoods? Why is it generally affluent whites that see treasure in another man's trash and are investing their time and money in renovating historic neighborhoods like ours? I don't know. I know this, though: If more affluent blacks and hispanics were making a commitment as many younger whites are to move into, and stick it out in these urban neighborhoods, get involved, and make a difference, no one would have a problem with the gentrification. Heck, gentrification might not even be a term in our lexicon. It would simply be called "progress".
With that in mind, I, a white guy from Podunk, Michigan (I'm holding up my hand and pointing to my palm right now), invite anyone, white, black, hispanic, anyone, to join me in revitalizing the Cole neighborhood. Buy an old home here, clean it up, become involved in the neighborhood, and help maintain the diversity of this great old neighborhood! But if you aren't willing to maintain your house, pick up your own trash, and call the police when you see something suspicious, I don't care what race you are, it's time you moved on.
Thanks for reading.
gentrification
The meeting was called to discuss the proposed re-zoning of the Phillips Center, a commercial building near our home. The current owner, is considering selling the property to a developer that wants to re-zone it as mixed commercial and residential, and put in a mixture of apartments, lofts, and potentially, store fronts (think coffee!).
There were about 12 Cole residents present for this meeting, with a diversity commensurate with our neighborhood--A mixture of black, white, and hispanic, including one woman that didn't speak a lick of English.
Most of the discussion centered around the proposed usage of the building, and whether this renovation would potentially add or detract from the neighborhood. Most of the people in attendance were relatively positive about the proposed changes, as if done correctly, it could add much-needed local retail space, as well as take what is largely an industrial building and give it some additional curb appeal. It also could potentially draw even more responsible neighbors into the area in my opinion--But admittedly if the new developers do the right thing in their work. And heaven forbid if it would possibly help our homes grow in value.
What amazed me at this meeting, and has in a general sense since we've moved into the neighborhood, is some residents' fear of the inevitable gentrification of the neighborhood.
First up, what is gentrification? Dictionary.com defines it as:
"The restoration and upgrading of deteriorated urban property by middle-class or affluent people, often resulting in displacement of lower-income people."
For a more comprehensive account of gentrifications and it's origins, see:
http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/001671.html
In simple terms, some residents of the neighborhood, from what I can see, mostly African American and Hispanic, are afraid of developers, largely generalized as white people, coming into the neighborhood and fixing and "flipping" properties for a profit. Their concern seems to be that in renovating the neighborhood, higher-priced homes and structures will replace the lower-priced ones, drive property taxes up, and as a result, displace those that can't afford the higher taxes. In regards to the Phillips Center, it seems they're afraid that there is no guarantee that the re-development will in fact provide at least some low-income housing, accelerating, and contributing to, the displacement. I share their concern, though, I must admit, I'm more concerned about the development's future owners not screening and monitoring the rental units in the new structure more than anything--We have enough sketchy characters and "independent pharmaceutical reps" (a.k.a. drug dealers) in the neighborhood. I'd rather see a well-maintained, high-priced rental property than a poorly-run, poorly-maintained low-income housing property. (In all fairness, there are several multiple-family rental properties just north and east of our neighborhood on the way to Downtown Neighborhood that I think qualify as "low income" or Section 8 housing, and they're beautiful, well maintained by their residents, and a welcome addition to the neighborhood, so I have no problem with lower-income housing if it's done correctly).
What the current residents don't seem to comprehend about gentrification, however, is the "restoration and upgrading of deteriorated urban property" part. How is this a bad thing? Can somebody please tell me that?
I'm all for diversity, both cultural and architectural. I would hate for this neighborhood to get largely scraped and re-built ala what is happening on the border between Lodo and the Highlands. I also would hate to see the neighborhood get developed into an overpriced, urban-hipster-type area like Ballpark or even Stapleton has become. I personally have seen enough "lofts" to last me for the rest of my life. I love the taco stand on the corner of Bruce Randolph and Downing, less than a block from our home, as well as the small fruit and vegetable stand there. I love the street vendors selling helados and elote, and would hate to see that flavor lost.
I also would be a little disappointed if I saw an Evil Empire (Starbucks) pop up in the neighborhood instead of a Peaberry's (at least a Colorado company) or an independent coffee shop, but anything--ANYTHING would be better than the mix of ghetto liquor stores and Mexican clothing stores we have now. Yes, we have local shopping, as long as you want to by a 40 of King Cobra, a pair of shrink-wrapped boot cut jeans and a ten-gallon hat.
I apologize for that rant-ish digression: My point is, our neighborhood is clearly "deteriorated" and in need of "restoration and upgrading", and it seems to me that gentrification is the only way this is going to happen. There are more old homes in this neighborhood that are falling apart due to neglect as their are that have been lovingly restored. Personally, if the existing residents aren't going to fix them up, I say give someone else a chance. It's understandable to not be financially able to rebuild or completely renovate your house (God knows Ash and I can relate, as we're really scraping by to make this home-ownership thing fly) but we're just asking you to take the stair-climber off your porch, pick up a beer bottle and pull a weed once in a while. In other words, take some pride in your home, and your neighborhood.
Take us for example. Our house was owned by a drug dealer, and was in a terrible state of disrepair before the developers fixed it up and we purchased it. Since we've moved in, we've greened the grass, planted trees and flowers, and regularly pick up rubbish on our block. Heck, I pick up rubbish on OTHER PEOPLE'S BLOCKS. I would think that folks would be thrilled to have us here, rather than the previous owner.
However, for example, at this neighborhood meeting, The current owner of the building in question seemed to single out my wife and I as the deserving recipients of a soapbox tirade (not too far removed from a rant) about how much he has done for the neighborhood (honestly, which he has, but we're not the enemy here), and implying that it wasn't the place of someone who just moved in to question his motives and plans for selling and renovating the Center.
Another woman there, who lives a few blocks away in a bordering neighborhood, supported his feelings about newcomers, and, interestingly, commented that there was "too much police presence" and racial profiling in Cole and that we didn't need it as "this is a great neighborhood". (Let me say here that I will be the first to admit I have no idea what it is like to be an African American in Denver, and if the police racially profile. I'm sure it happens from time to time, and that is a shame in this day and age. But I would hope that even the most liberal African American would agree that an increased police presence, especially in this neighborhood, will reduce the drugs, and crime in general, and that is a good thing. I would also hope that they would at least consider the probability that the DPD as a whole has our best interest in mind--and like any other group or organization, there can be bad members that reflect poorly on an otherwise admirable whole.) Oops, tangent alert--Anyway, she made it clear that she resented the newcomers to the neighborhood as they (we) were diluting the diversity. Ironic, since as one of the few white couples in the 'hood, by moving in we actually are increasing the diversity--do the math folks. But anyway, my point here is that newcomers (we, basically) were portrayed almost like colonialist invaders or something. Reverse discrimination anyone? So what if Cole is a historically black neighborhood. Should that prevent us from moving in? Do you think it would fly if Thornton, a largely white suburb, discouraged blacks from moving in? It's not any different.
Bottom line, if the folks that are moving in are fixing it up and taking more pride in the neighborhood, and you're against these folks moving in, then you're against the neighborhood being fixed up. This is simple logic here folks (A=B, B=C, therefore, A=C; one of the few benefits of my liberal arts education). With this in mind, it seems pretty clear to me that there are in reality many residents here that are anti-progress, anti-revitalization, and would rather have the neighborhood remain run-down, trash-filled, and crime infested, which I find quite sad. Can anyone tell me why one would take low property taxes over living in a safer, cleaner, nicer neighborhood?
And don't try to convince me this neighborhood doesn't still have a ways to go. We still have a terrible trash problem, and still have the occasional gang banger and druggie pass through our overall very benign block. Unless residents want to drive these dirt-bags out, a vigilant police presence is essential. And whether it's trash, vandalism, drugs, or other crime, many of the long-time residents that still live here don't seem to care in my opinion. They still keep old furniture on their porches, drop trash and beer bottles in the street, look the other way when someone is selling crack on the corner, and don't maintain their homes.
If this is the diversity that we risk losing, I say let it happen. Yup, you can add me to your "most hated" list right below President Bush. It'll be hard, but I'll get over it.
I personally don't care whether the "gentrifiers" are black, white, Hispanic, Native American, whatever, as long as they care about the neighborhood and take some pride in ownership in their homes, they're welcome additions to me.
Unfortunately, in my opinion, too many minorities simplify the gentrification issue into a purely racial subject--Namely white people moving in and displacing blacks and hispanics. No doubt, in Denver, that's largely the case.
But that illustrates some sort of larger social question I guess--Namely, why aren't there more affluent blacks and hispanics moving into these urban neighborhoods? Why is it generally affluent whites that see treasure in another man's trash and are investing their time and money in renovating historic neighborhoods like ours? I don't know. I know this, though: If more affluent blacks and hispanics were making a commitment as many younger whites are to move into, and stick it out in these urban neighborhoods, get involved, and make a difference, no one would have a problem with the gentrification. Heck, gentrification might not even be a term in our lexicon. It would simply be called "progress".
With that in mind, I, a white guy from Podunk, Michigan (I'm holding up my hand and pointing to my palm right now), invite anyone, white, black, hispanic, anyone, to join me in revitalizing the Cole neighborhood. Buy an old home here, clean it up, become involved in the neighborhood, and help maintain the diversity of this great old neighborhood! But if you aren't willing to maintain your house, pick up your own trash, and call the police when you see something suspicious, I don't care what race you are, it's time you moved on.
Thanks for reading.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)