Cole-Whittier Neighborhood Clean Up coming May 12th

Ever notice that right after you clean up your house, you're suddenly in a more positive state of mind? That the world feels like a better, friendlier place?

Or how about every six months when you take your old car down to the car wash. I'm not just talking about giving your car a bath--I'm talking about an inside-and-out cleaning that takes several walks over to the coin changer and that eventually sets you back about $5 to $8. You know the one--Where you repeatedly plug the coin-operated vacuum to evacuate all the dirt, dust, dog hair, old french fries, etc. from the inside of your car, and that finishes with a nice once-over using protectant to put the shine back on the dash? Isn't it amazing how simply cleaning your car up suddenly makes it feel brand new again? How when you pull away your car even feels like it drives better simply because it's clean?

I think the same thing could be said for neighborhoods (and there is research out there to support this assertion). In particular, I often wonder what a truly clean Cole Neighborhood would do for residents' sense of pride and ownership about where they live.

A cleaner Cole would not only make residents feel better about their neighborhood, but also better "market" the area to prospective residents and businesses that come through each and every day. Whether they're just passing through by chance, or here evaluating a potential home purchase or piece of business real estate, there really isn't any argument against the fact that our constant litter problem casts a shadow over the many positive things that are happening over here.

I try to do my part to pick up trash on my block, as well as other blocks for that matter when convenient; but my wife and I have often thought that a neighborhood-wide cleaning effort would be a good thing.

Kudos to the folks at MOP for putting together just such an event--The Cole-Whittier Neighborhood Clean Up, to be held May 12th from 9:30 to 12:00, starting at Cole Middle School.

I hope they have a good turnout for it, and that they can make a tangible "dent" (albeit a temporary one) in the ubiquitous litter in our neighborhood.

And for residents that can't make it, or are unaware of the clean up altogether, I hope that in fact there at least some minimal "momentum" generated by this effort. Meaning that some residents will notice that someone cleaned up their block, and perhaps make a little more effort to keep it that way.

Looks like residents interested in more information on the clean up can contact Brett Warner at brett.cwac@gmail.com or 720.299.2738.

Enforcement just a part of Broken Windows Policing

One of the criticisms of Broken Windows Policing (which has come to Cole as part of Cole-Whittier Against Crime) often mentioned by civil libertarians is that it simply serves to further overburden the current "oppressive" criminal justice system with its increased enforcement of "lesser" and quality-of-life crimes--While ignoring the larger, structural problems in our society that in fact cause crime.

However, these critics seem to either be unaware of, or perhaps deliberately choose to ignore, that Broken Windows theorists share the opinion that the current American model of policing, (introduced in the 1930's as the "reform" model and now referred to as the "traditional" model), has failed society miserably.

In fact, Broken Windows proponents suggest that we should replace this flawed traditional model with a newer, progressive, "community policing model". One where police don't just fight crime and arrest bad guys, but instead elevate their role in the community to problem solver and even as ombudsmen to other public and private agencies.

While ambitious, supplementing or replacing our current criminal justice system with this newer, community-based system would in fact serve to address the structural causes of crime that seem to be so important to civil libertarians.

While anyone taking the time to read Kelling's book (I'm on pace to finish it this week) will learn about this community policing model, I have sought a concise, clear, online reference I could link to from this site to provide visitors the opportunity to learn about it to.

Just today I found that resource: Policing.com, a site created by Bonnie Bucqueroux, an expert in community policing with over 20 years experience. So, I highly recommend everyone take ten minutes to read her article on What Community Policing Teaches Us. And of course, if it piques your interest, pick up a copy of Kelling's Book.

Indeed, C-WAC already includes a community safety survey intended to convey residents' concerns, information about high-crime areas and key issues, and perceptions about the police department to officials to help guide, and on an ongoing basis, evaluate, the program. Additionally, foot- and bike-patrol is being incorporated to get officers out of their cars and into the community where they can better get to know (and be known) by the residents they protect. All these are components of Broken Windows and community policing.

All these are also small parts of an overall approach in true community policing that includes community courts that funnel offenders back into the communities that their injure, as well as city governments, prosecutors, as well as city and private agencies that are unified in their support and commitment to community policing.

Over time, will the Denver Police Department, through Cole-Whittier Against Crime, truly commit to community policing, or just focus on the easy part, the enforcement? I of course don't have that answer, but the fact that they (at least initially) seem to be beginning to embrace a community-based policing model in incorporating community guidance, feedback, and accountability into the program, I think is encouraging at the least. And, it's not likey true, sweeping community police reform will happen without first seeing smaller steps and successes along the way.

Realistically, such a profound change won't happen overnight, or without the continued participation of community leaders as well as police. It's our job as much as it is the police's to ensure accountability and that Cole-Whittier Against Crime is a success.

But to me, the potential upside of incorporating a community policing model in Denver, even if on a small scale, to me is so exciting, we need to give Cole-Whittier Against Crime a real chance, rather than assume the worst and doom it to fail.

Thanks for reading.

A Cyclist For City Council District 8

So I must admit I'm shocked to have heard from two of the city council candidates after my post yesterday about Coleneighborhood.net's picks for the upcoming Denver City election.

First off, I'd like to thank Ms. Madison and Mr. Rasheed for reading and commenting on the site.

Second, I'd like to thank Ms. Madison and Mr. Rasheed for their clarification that in addition to Mr. Watson, each of them have bicycles in their history as well--Ms. Madison as an active cyclist, and Mr. Rasheed as a member of Mayor Hickenlooper's Biking Advisory Council from 2004-2006.

Why does that matter to me? Well, while currently I'm myopic about crime and safety in Cole, as well as bringing some key businesses in to drive the continued redevelopment of the area, at heart I believe the bicycle can solve many of today's problems.

I know, to many it may sound a bit crazy, but I do.

Childhood obesity? Get kids on their bikes. Adult obesity? How about cycling as a low-impact, fun and healthy adult activity? Concerned about traffic? Get more people on bikes for commuting. Dependence on foreign oil? Pollution? Ditto. Even the issue of gangs and keeping youth out of trouble has some relevance to cycling--Supposedly Fred Rodriguez, one of the top American competitive cyclists, credits the bicycle for keeping him from heading down the path of destruction that many of his friends did, growing up in urban Los Angeles.

Denver is a relatively bicycle-friendly city thanks to efforts by Bicycle Colorado, Bike Denver, and other advocacy organizations, but the bicycle needs to be taken into consideration in any urban planning to be done in North Denver, too. Glad to hear at least bicycling is on the radar of several of the candidates.

Finally, there is an exciting event coming to the Curtis Park neighborhood this summer--The Curtis Park Criteriums. Part of a multi-day amateur and professional competitive cycling and handcycling event, the race will bring 3-500 competitors and spectators to the Curtis Park area. The promoter, Beth-Wrenn Estes of the American Cycling Association, a former North Denver resident, conceived the event as a way to spotlight the area's unique and historic nature, as well as make a positive contribution to neighborhood youths (free bike helmets will be provided to many kids that take part in the kids races).

So how does this relate to city council and the above-referenced candidates? Well, thus far the organizers have received zero support or assistance from the city (Specifically, Councilwoman Elbra Wedgeworth, who apparently told them "I'm too busy to even look at this right now") cutting through the red tape or exorbitant expenses they're fighting to make this great event a reality.

Since several of the candidates have some involvement with cycling and bicycle advocacy in their background, whomever the voters select, I am hopeful that the promoters of this, and other valuable area events, will receive more cooperation from city council.

As always, thanks for reading, and good luck to all the candidates in District 8 on the coming election day.

Get Your Denver Election Ballots in!

I know... I know... it's 7 days before voting day, why wait so long to call for citizens to get their votes in?

I guess it was the realization that despite being incredibly involved now in our neighborhood associations, issues, and politics, I'm sitting here today, just finally getting my own ballot in. With that in mind, I'm betting there are many more people that care about Cole (and District 8, and the City of Denver in general) that likely still have their ballots sitting on the kitchen table.

I do wish more of our neighbors in Cole took a more active role in shaping what the neighborhood will become--We all have strong opinions about what is great or not-so-great about Cole, and what changes we'd like to see in the future--But unfortunately, too many times we don't get involved to actually effect that change. And what better way to start than by voting in Denver's upcoming city election? Unfortunately, I'm not optimistic the election even shows up on the radar of most residents.

Now don't get me wrong--I understand the discouraging reality of voting in America--Namely the reality that a greater majority of the population turned out to vote in Iraq's 2005 elections (70%!) than ever do for an election in America--But I'm talking about the people that seem like they have it "together", for lack of a better term, but don't vote. I must admit, up until the 2004 presidential election, I was one of those people--At which point my father used to say "You're not allowed to have an opinion on politics, unless you register and vote." Smart guy, my dad.

Like a few of our neighbors--They're younger, educated, affluent people, with good jobs, new homes in Cole, and never a shortage of opinions on how our neighborhood could be improved. One couple is never short on complaints--Whether it be the crime problem, the trash problem, the condition of their neighbor's home, etc.--Yet despite numerous efforts to get them involved in the neighborhood, it has been somewhat like keeping a candle lit in a gusty windstorm. In all reality, it's likely just that they're busy, as we all are--But I'm impatient about change in Cole--and understand that doesn't happen without a group of involved and committed individuals, which the neighborhood is still seeking.

For example, we've had neighborhood meetings as large as 45 people, but inevitably, the next one shrinks back down to the same 4 or 5 involved residents. How do we expect things to change in Cole without being willing to become fundamentally involved in the process?

Well, sorry for the tangent. I hope most residents in fact will turn in their ballots, and just as importantly have done their due diligence on the candidates and their positions on key issues. But for residents still on the fence, I'm not averse to pointing out some reasons why I've picked the candidates I have.

So, without further ado, for those residents that couldn't make the last Cole Neighborhood Association meeting (where several of the District 8 City Council candidates spoke) because Survivor was on; or for those residents that legitimately have just been too busy to familiarize themselves with the District 8 candidates and issues, for what it's worth, here are Coleneighborhood.net's election picks for District 8 for the upcoming Denver city election:

• Mayor: John Hickenlooper

Why? Because despite my concerns that he's largely ignored issues specific to Denver's urban neighborhoods in his first tenure, there really isn't any other real candidate running. Thanks for stepping up for what you believe in, Mr. Lopez, but I don't think you stand a chance, nor have the necessary or relevant experience to be mayor of a large city like Denver. But again, I certainly applaud you for stepping up, and I wish you the best of luck in your future pursuits--Hopefully that will include starting with some other elected position and building a track record or base of experience--and who knows, then you could be my pick next time around.

Additionally, I have to give Hick some credit as the guy most associated with the revitalization of LoDo, and the architect behind bringing Broken Windows theory (Yes, I support Broken Windows) to Denver. So John, I'm voting for you buddy--Here's hoping you focus more on neighborhood-level issues in your second term.

• Auditor and Clerk and Recorder: Dennis Gallagher and Stephanie O'Malley.

Why? Because the Denver Post endorses them, and for reasons that make sense to me. (Sorry I don't have more of an opinion on this). In particular, it sounds like Ms. O'Malley is likely to make some substantive changes to Denver's woefully inadequate voting processes, which I think everyone that waited in the unbelievable lines at last election would deem an honorable use of an elected official's time. Sorry, these two seats just aren't all that important to this voter (though they likely should be). If Mr. Gallagher can add and subtract, and Ms. O'Malley in reality does seek reform of Denver's voting processes, that's all I need to know.

• Councilmembers At Large: Doug Linkhart and Carol E. Campbell.

Why? Doug Linkhart has voiced his dissatisfaction in both Mr. Hickenlooper's and outgoing Council member Elbra Wedgeworth's track record in tackling the many issues North Denver metro neighborhoods face. He also talks a good talk when it comes to crime. Additionally, he seems sincerely interested in "filling in" and redeveloping the blighted "horseshoe" that still rings the redeveloped downtown to the north (and to which Cole belongs). Finally, he shares my belief that the North Denver neighborhoods like Cole, Whittier, and Curtis Park at this point have enough homeless, drug and alcohol-related shelters--It's time for Highlands, and some of the other urban Denver 'hoods to do their part and host some of these important facilities.

Carol Campbell similarly seems ready to tackle head-on the crime and disorder issues that plague urban Denver. I applaud her for consistently not skirting the issues, or candy-coating her opinions, though I'm sure they open her up for some heated criticisms. For example, she's not been afraid to speak out about the dim-witted Denver tradition of spending police dollars every year to facilitate Cinco de Mayo cruising. Is she being racist in speaking out against Cinco de Mayo cruising, because she's white and the participants are Hispanic? No, she's not, because it's not about race. I don't care if they were Starbucks-drinking yuppies blasting Yanni in their 3-series BMW's, cruising is a bona fide problem, that adversely affects residents and businesses along the Federal corridor. I lived over there, and know first-hand how hard it is to even get out of your block to go to the Safeway for a gallon of milk on that day every year--Not to mention the residual beer and liquor bottles residents are left to clean up for weeks afterwards. And this is a problem that affects all residents over there--black, white, hispanic, rich and poor.

So, because Carol Campbell appears to be a straight-shooter that has lived "on the front lines" of urban Denver, and doesn't think the current disorder and crime situation should be tolerated, she'll get my vote.

Council Member District 8: Carla Madison.

What played into my decision? Well, for me, first and foremost I want a candidate that is available and responsive--In other words, the anti-Elbra.

Next, for this voter, crime and public safety top my list of issues, followed closely by the need to attract more and better businesses to Cole. Thus, my evaluations of the candidates were shaped by these key issues. You might have other hotbuttons, and as such, do your own reading on these candidates (you'll find links to many of their websites in this post and on the right side of the page) and make the pick that is right for you.

I really wanted to vote for a candidate of color for District 8, given the diversity of our district, but I haven't been able to get all that excited about any one candidate, except perhaps Ms. Madison. As such, on this one, I'm going to start with the other candidates before explaining where in my mind they fell short, before I share why I feel Carla is the best choice:

Lynn Smith has a lot of good things to say, particularly regarding redevelopment and zoning, but as a write-in candidate, I don't know that she has a real chance of winning, so I think voting for her would most likely just be taking away a vote that could potentially keep Sharon Bailey out of office (more on that later).

I initially was leaning towards voting for Darrell Watson, because even as a person of color, he has done enough homework to embrace Broken Windows. I am impressed with his work on the Biased Policing Task Force, where he opened dialog between residents and police to solve distrust and profiling concerns, rather than just throwing stones--as in my opinion the CPC is currently doing in response to the Cole-Whittier Against Crime initiative. His resume is similarly strengthened because of his leadership of the Whittier neighborhood association, which from the outside appears to be a very organized, effective organization. I also appreciate his interest in smart redevelopment through support of local businesses. The fact that he is a cyclist doesn't hurt, either. Finally, again given the diversity of our district, I think that it would be wonderful to have an African-American, openly gay city council member.

However, every time I've heard him speak, he makes some big promises that he's going to have a lot of trouble keeping (like saying if elected, he'll get the decision to use streetcars instead of light rail to connect the Downtown transit system to the new 40th/40th station overturned--Not try, he'll "get it done"). Also, his speeches are so rehearsed that to me he seems insincere, which leaves me uncomfortable about what he'd be like if elected. I don't vote for scripted, rehearsed politicians, I vote for real people that I can relate to, and I can't say for me that is Darrell Watson.

But the final straw was when I started receiving unsolicited campaign emails from Mr. Watson. I'm guessing he obtained my address from a neighborhood association list (which makes me wonder who provided it to him as well), but I know I never asked for emails from him. I was able to unsubscribe, but my personal email to Mr. Watson stating my unhappiness with his action went unanswered. Not encouraging from a potential elected official, so I crossed him off the list.

Greg Rasheed was a close third pick for me initially, but after further thought I had to move him up to a very close second. While he has said he clearly has concerns about Broken Windows, he seems to understand there is a real crime problem in the area. He makes a good case for investing in programs for youth in our community, to better recognize the many very bright and talented kids that otherwise seem to go unnoticed due to economics, race, and what school district they belong to. Though I don't have children, I have to admit at times it's tough in this neighborhood seeing how little praise, how little encouragement, and how little positive reinforcement and guidance children in Cole seem to get. I agree whole-heartedly that any long-term solution to the gang and youth crime problem needs to include positive, youth-targeted programs and activities.

I also get the feeling that despite Mr. Rasheed's steadfast belief in strengthening our communities through investment in and nurturing of our youth, he seems to understand, like I do, that youth programs and community programs alone won't fix the crime problem in District 8.

Interestingly, I was unable to learn much about his positions on some key topics as each time he spoke at the public forums, he ran out of time before he really got "warmed up" and to the meat and potatoes of his points. His website, too, was a little light on real information to me. But, to his credit, he seems to be infinitely available (which is refreshing, and hopefully would translate into similar approachability should he be elected), as evidenced by his prompt reply to this, and other blogs that have mentioned him in the days leading up to the elections. So you need to dig a little deeper to see where he stands on some things, but that information is out there.

A very big thumbs up for Mr. Rasheed's availability and responsiveness to nerdy bloggers like me--In doing my research, I don't think I found one blog dealing with this election where Mr. Rasheed hadn't taken the time to write a personal response (or several). And he certainly has been quick to respond to posts on Coleneighborhood.net. While he didn't end up being my pick, I am becoming more and more confident that Mr. Rasheed would be a fantastic selection by the voters.

Sharon Bailey looks good on paper, I guess, but once she opens her mouth I want to leave the room or change the channel. She goes on and on and on about how she's the most qualified candidate, how she did this, how she did that, etc. etc., blah blah blah. She's very proud of herself, in my opinion, too much so, and as such reminds me of Elbra Wedgeworth, who, no secret here, I despise for her lack of action and accountability in District 8. I'm concerned that Ms. Bailey similarly has some sort of personal agenda that she'll start to serve during her term if elected, at the expense of the district (a la Elbra).

Which brings us to Carla. Why do I like Carla? First, she isn't a great public speaker. I know what you're thinking: Why support someone because they didn't take the time or initiative to attend a Toastmasters class a couple times before running for public office? Well for me, while I wish for her own sake she was a bit more polished behind the microphone, I feel rock solid that what you see is what you get with Carla Madison--And that makes all the difference too me. I don't expect a city council member to be slick, or necessarily have all the answers--I'm more looking to someone with similar values and a sincere willingness to work with their constituency to make tangible change a reality in the district. (Incidentally, as my wife pointed out to me, and as I verified via Youtube, it seems Ms. Madison is beginning to find her voice behind the microphone, as her later speeches seem much better articulated--while still sounding very genuine--than her earlier ones).

She has also been the most visible candidate in Cole over the last few months--Attending neighborhood meetings (not just the one where all the candidates were present to give their sales pitch), Manual High School planning meetings, Cole-Whittier Against Crime Meetings, and other community events.

She supports Broken Windows; believes in "smart" redevelopment of historic neighborhoods like Cole, while maintaining the historical and architectural character; and she has a strong track-record of leadership at the neighborhood level as president and involved member of her City Park neighborhood association. So for me, she scores highly relative to my beliefs on safety and redevelopment, as well as education, and as such, she'll get my vote.

These are just my picks--I encourage everyone to spend a couple hours with Google and do their own homework and vote accordingly. Whomever you pick, VOTE! And the bottom line is realistically that any of the above candidates will be an improvement over Elbra Wedgeworth, who in my opinion checked out years ago.

I'm excited to see who the residents of District 8 pick--And even more excited to see what we can achieve in this district with a councilperson that is sincerely committed to positive change.

Thanks for reading.

Cole-Whittier Against Crime community meeting: April 23rd, 6PM, Mitchell Elementary

Sorry for the delay in putting out any substantive posts lately. Needless to say a lot has been happening though with the police collaboration initiative (now called Cole-Whittier Against Crime), the corresponding public safety survey, and the upcoming neighborhood cleanup in Cole (Saturday, May 12th).

Anyway, wanted to get something out online about the upcoming Cole-Whittier Against Crime meeting. This Monday, April 23rd, 6PM, Mitchell Elementary.

And get your mail-in ballots in ASAP for the upcoming city elections!

Denver City Council District 8 Candidate Forum

From the recent Cole Neighborhood Association Meeting. Check the candidates out and you be the judge:

http://denverdirect.blogspot.com/2007/03/candidates-for-denver-city-council.html

Thanks go out to Denver Direct for putting these all together on one easy-to-find website/blog.

Cole/Whittier Community-Police Collaboration Meeting: April 9th

Please join us Monday, April 9th, at 6PM at Mitchell Elementary (1350 E. 33rd Avenue) for the latest in a series of collaborative community meetings to help shape what the new Community Safety Plan will look like in Cole-Whittier. We've made huge strides over the last few meetings, but need the cooperation and input from as many residents as possible. Some potential topics for discussion:

• Help finalize the Community Safety Survey and plan for survey distribution
• Review current neighborhood safety data
• Work with other residents and DPD to envision the implementation of the new community safety plan

We need more residents to be involved in the planning process to ensure this program's success--And whatever your vision is for Cole-Whittier--Whether it's large-scale redevelopment, increased commerce and services, improved healthcare services or education--It all starts with community safety and crime prevention.

For more information, contact Karla Loaiza at 720.276.1492.

We hope to see you there.