One of the criticisms of Broken Windows Policing (which has come to Cole as part of Cole-Whittier Against Crime) often mentioned by civil libertarians is that it simply serves to further overburden the current "oppressive" criminal justice system with its increased enforcement of "lesser" and quality-of-life crimes--While ignoring the larger, structural problems in our society that in fact cause crime.
However, these critics seem to either be unaware of, or perhaps deliberately choose to ignore, that Broken Windows theorists share the opinion that the current American model of policing, (introduced in the 1930's as the "reform" model and now referred to as the "traditional" model), has failed society miserably.
In fact, Broken Windows proponents suggest that we should replace this flawed traditional model with a newer, progressive, "community policing model". One where police don't just fight crime and arrest bad guys, but instead elevate their role in the community to problem solver and even as ombudsmen to other public and private agencies.
While ambitious, supplementing or replacing our current criminal justice system with this newer, community-based system would in fact serve to address the structural causes of crime that seem to be so important to civil libertarians.
While anyone taking the time to read Kelling's book (I'm on pace to finish it this week) will learn about this community policing model, I have sought a concise, clear, online reference I could link to from this site to provide visitors the opportunity to learn about it to.
Just today I found that resource: Policing.com, a site created by Bonnie Bucqueroux, an expert in community policing with over 20 years experience. So, I highly recommend everyone take ten minutes to read her article on What Community Policing Teaches Us. And of course, if it piques your interest, pick up a copy of Kelling's Book.
Indeed, C-WAC already includes a community safety survey intended to convey residents' concerns, information about high-crime areas and key issues, and perceptions about the police department to officials to help guide, and on an ongoing basis, evaluate, the program. Additionally, foot- and bike-patrol is being incorporated to get officers out of their cars and into the community where they can better get to know (and be known) by the residents they protect. All these are components of Broken Windows and community policing.
All these are also small parts of an overall approach in true community policing that includes community courts that funnel offenders back into the communities that their injure, as well as city governments, prosecutors, as well as city and private agencies that are unified in their support and commitment to community policing.
Over time, will the Denver Police Department, through Cole-Whittier Against Crime, truly commit to community policing, or just focus on the easy part, the enforcement? I of course don't have that answer, but the fact that they (at least initially) seem to be beginning to embrace a community-based policing model in incorporating community guidance, feedback, and accountability into the program, I think is encouraging at the least. And, it's not likey true, sweeping community police reform will happen without first seeing smaller steps and successes along the way.
Realistically, such a profound change won't happen overnight, or without the continued participation of community leaders as well as police. It's our job as much as it is the police's to ensure accountability and that Cole-Whittier Against Crime is a success.
But to me, the potential upside of incorporating a community policing model in Denver, even if on a small scale, to me is so exciting, we need to give Cole-Whittier Against Crime a real chance, rather than assume the worst and doom it to fail.
Thanks for reading.
Saturday, April 28, 2007
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
A Cyclist For City Council District 8
So I must admit I'm shocked to have heard from two of the city council candidates after my post yesterday about Coleneighborhood.net's picks for the upcoming Denver City election.
First off, I'd like to thank Ms. Madison and Mr. Rasheed for reading and commenting on the site.
Second, I'd like to thank Ms. Madison and Mr. Rasheed for their clarification that in addition to Mr. Watson, each of them have bicycles in their history as well--Ms. Madison as an active cyclist, and Mr. Rasheed as a member of Mayor Hickenlooper's Biking Advisory Council from 2004-2006.
Why does that matter to me? Well, while currently I'm myopic about crime and safety in Cole, as well as bringing some key businesses in to drive the continued redevelopment of the area, at heart I believe the bicycle can solve many of today's problems.
I know, to many it may sound a bit crazy, but I do.
Childhood obesity? Get kids on their bikes. Adult obesity? How about cycling as a low-impact, fun and healthy adult activity? Concerned about traffic? Get more people on bikes for commuting. Dependence on foreign oil? Pollution? Ditto. Even the issue of gangs and keeping youth out of trouble has some relevance to cycling--Supposedly Fred Rodriguez, one of the top American competitive cyclists, credits the bicycle for keeping him from heading down the path of destruction that many of his friends did, growing up in urban Los Angeles.
Denver is a relatively bicycle-friendly city thanks to efforts by Bicycle Colorado, Bike Denver, and other advocacy organizations, but the bicycle needs to be taken into consideration in any urban planning to be done in North Denver, too. Glad to hear at least bicycling is on the radar of several of the candidates.
Finally, there is an exciting event coming to the Curtis Park neighborhood this summer--The Curtis Park Criteriums. Part of a multi-day amateur and professional competitive cycling and handcycling event, the race will bring 3-500 competitors and spectators to the Curtis Park area. The promoter, Beth-Wrenn Estes of the American Cycling Association, a former North Denver resident, conceived the event as a way to spotlight the area's unique and historic nature, as well as make a positive contribution to neighborhood youths (free bike helmets will be provided to many kids that take part in the kids races).
So how does this relate to city council and the above-referenced candidates? Well, thus far the organizers have received zero support or assistance from the city (Specifically, Councilwoman Elbra Wedgeworth, who apparently told them "I'm too busy to even look at this right now") cutting through the red tape or exorbitant expenses they're fighting to make this great event a reality.
Since several of the candidates have some involvement with cycling and bicycle advocacy in their background, whomever the voters select, I am hopeful that the promoters of this, and other valuable area events, will receive more cooperation from city council.
As always, thanks for reading, and good luck to all the candidates in District 8 on the coming election day.
First off, I'd like to thank Ms. Madison and Mr. Rasheed for reading and commenting on the site.
Second, I'd like to thank Ms. Madison and Mr. Rasheed for their clarification that in addition to Mr. Watson, each of them have bicycles in their history as well--Ms. Madison as an active cyclist, and Mr. Rasheed as a member of Mayor Hickenlooper's Biking Advisory Council from 2004-2006.
Why does that matter to me? Well, while currently I'm myopic about crime and safety in Cole, as well as bringing some key businesses in to drive the continued redevelopment of the area, at heart I believe the bicycle can solve many of today's problems.
I know, to many it may sound a bit crazy, but I do.
Childhood obesity? Get kids on their bikes. Adult obesity? How about cycling as a low-impact, fun and healthy adult activity? Concerned about traffic? Get more people on bikes for commuting. Dependence on foreign oil? Pollution? Ditto. Even the issue of gangs and keeping youth out of trouble has some relevance to cycling--Supposedly Fred Rodriguez, one of the top American competitive cyclists, credits the bicycle for keeping him from heading down the path of destruction that many of his friends did, growing up in urban Los Angeles.
Denver is a relatively bicycle-friendly city thanks to efforts by Bicycle Colorado, Bike Denver, and other advocacy organizations, but the bicycle needs to be taken into consideration in any urban planning to be done in North Denver, too. Glad to hear at least bicycling is on the radar of several of the candidates.
Finally, there is an exciting event coming to the Curtis Park neighborhood this summer--The Curtis Park Criteriums. Part of a multi-day amateur and professional competitive cycling and handcycling event, the race will bring 3-500 competitors and spectators to the Curtis Park area. The promoter, Beth-Wrenn Estes of the American Cycling Association, a former North Denver resident, conceived the event as a way to spotlight the area's unique and historic nature, as well as make a positive contribution to neighborhood youths (free bike helmets will be provided to many kids that take part in the kids races).
So how does this relate to city council and the above-referenced candidates? Well, thus far the organizers have received zero support or assistance from the city (Specifically, Councilwoman Elbra Wedgeworth, who apparently told them "I'm too busy to even look at this right now") cutting through the red tape or exorbitant expenses they're fighting to make this great event a reality.
Since several of the candidates have some involvement with cycling and bicycle advocacy in their background, whomever the voters select, I am hopeful that the promoters of this, and other valuable area events, will receive more cooperation from city council.
As always, thanks for reading, and good luck to all the candidates in District 8 on the coming election day.
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Get Your Denver Election Ballots in!
I know... I know... it's 7 days before voting day, why wait so long to call for citizens to get their votes in?
I guess it was the realization that despite being incredibly involved now in our neighborhood associations, issues, and politics, I'm sitting here today, just finally getting my own ballot in. With that in mind, I'm betting there are many more people that care about Cole (and District 8, and the City of Denver in general) that likely still have their ballots sitting on the kitchen table.
I do wish more of our neighbors in Cole took a more active role in shaping what the neighborhood will become--We all have strong opinions about what is great or not-so-great about Cole, and what changes we'd like to see in the future--But unfortunately, too many times we don't get involved to actually effect that change. And what better way to start than by voting in Denver's upcoming city election? Unfortunately, I'm not optimistic the election even shows up on the radar of most residents.
Now don't get me wrong--I understand the discouraging reality of voting in America--Namely the reality that a greater majority of the population turned out to vote in Iraq's 2005 elections (70%!) than ever do for an election in America--But I'm talking about the people that seem like they have it "together", for lack of a better term, but don't vote. I must admit, up until the 2004 presidential election, I was one of those people--At which point my father used to say "You're not allowed to have an opinion on politics, unless you register and vote." Smart guy, my dad.
Like a few of our neighbors--They're younger, educated, affluent people, with good jobs, new homes in Cole, and never a shortage of opinions on how our neighborhood could be improved. One couple is never short on complaints--Whether it be the crime problem, the trash problem, the condition of their neighbor's home, etc.--Yet despite numerous efforts to get them involved in the neighborhood, it has been somewhat like keeping a candle lit in a gusty windstorm. In all reality, it's likely just that they're busy, as we all are--But I'm impatient about change in Cole--and understand that doesn't happen without a group of involved and committed individuals, which the neighborhood is still seeking.
For example, we've had neighborhood meetings as large as 45 people, but inevitably, the next one shrinks back down to the same 4 or 5 involved residents. How do we expect things to change in Cole without being willing to become fundamentally involved in the process?
Well, sorry for the tangent. I hope most residents in fact will turn in their ballots, and just as importantly have done their due diligence on the candidates and their positions on key issues. But for residents still on the fence, I'm not averse to pointing out some reasons why I've picked the candidates I have.
So, without further ado, for those residents that couldn't make the last Cole Neighborhood Association meeting (where several of the District 8 City Council candidates spoke) because Survivor was on; or for those residents that legitimately have just been too busy to familiarize themselves with the District 8 candidates and issues, for what it's worth, here are Coleneighborhood.net's election picks for District 8 for the upcoming Denver city election:
I guess it was the realization that despite being incredibly involved now in our neighborhood associations, issues, and politics, I'm sitting here today, just finally getting my own ballot in. With that in mind, I'm betting there are many more people that care about Cole (and District 8, and the City of Denver in general) that likely still have their ballots sitting on the kitchen table.
I do wish more of our neighbors in Cole took a more active role in shaping what the neighborhood will become--We all have strong opinions about what is great or not-so-great about Cole, and what changes we'd like to see in the future--But unfortunately, too many times we don't get involved to actually effect that change. And what better way to start than by voting in Denver's upcoming city election? Unfortunately, I'm not optimistic the election even shows up on the radar of most residents.
Now don't get me wrong--I understand the discouraging reality of voting in America--Namely the reality that a greater majority of the population turned out to vote in Iraq's 2005 elections (70%!) than ever do for an election in America--But I'm talking about the people that seem like they have it "together", for lack of a better term, but don't vote. I must admit, up until the 2004 presidential election, I was one of those people--At which point my father used to say "You're not allowed to have an opinion on politics, unless you register and vote." Smart guy, my dad.
Like a few of our neighbors--They're younger, educated, affluent people, with good jobs, new homes in Cole, and never a shortage of opinions on how our neighborhood could be improved. One couple is never short on complaints--Whether it be the crime problem, the trash problem, the condition of their neighbor's home, etc.--Yet despite numerous efforts to get them involved in the neighborhood, it has been somewhat like keeping a candle lit in a gusty windstorm. In all reality, it's likely just that they're busy, as we all are--But I'm impatient about change in Cole--and understand that doesn't happen without a group of involved and committed individuals, which the neighborhood is still seeking.
For example, we've had neighborhood meetings as large as 45 people, but inevitably, the next one shrinks back down to the same 4 or 5 involved residents. How do we expect things to change in Cole without being willing to become fundamentally involved in the process?
Well, sorry for the tangent. I hope most residents in fact will turn in their ballots, and just as importantly have done their due diligence on the candidates and their positions on key issues. But for residents still on the fence, I'm not averse to pointing out some reasons why I've picked the candidates I have.
So, without further ado, for those residents that couldn't make the last Cole Neighborhood Association meeting (where several of the District 8 City Council candidates spoke) because Survivor was on; or for those residents that legitimately have just been too busy to familiarize themselves with the District 8 candidates and issues, for what it's worth, here are Coleneighborhood.net's election picks for District 8 for the upcoming Denver city election:
- Mayor: John Hickenlooper
Why? Because despite my concerns that he's largely ignored issues specific to Denver's urban neighborhoods in his first tenure, there really isn't any other real candidate running. Thanks for stepping up for what you believe in, Mr. Lopez, but I don't think you stand a chance, nor have the necessary or relevant experience to be mayor of a large city like Denver. But again, I certainly applaud you for stepping up, and I wish you the best of luck in your future pursuits--Hopefully that will include starting with some other elected position and building a track record or base of experience--and who knows, then you could be my pick next time around.
Additionally, I have to give Hick some credit as the guy most associated with the revitalization of LoDo, and the architect behind bringing Broken Windows theory (Yes, I support Broken Windows) to Denver. So John, I'm voting for you buddy--Here's hoping you focus more on neighborhood-level issues in your second term.
- Auditor and Clerk and Recorder: Dennis Gallagher and Stephanie O'Malley.
Why? Because the Denver Post endorses them, and for reasons that make sense to me. (Sorry I don't have more of an opinion on this). In particular, it sounds like Ms. O'Malley is likely to make some substantive changes to Denver's woefully inadequate voting processes, which I think everyone that waited in the unbelievable lines at last election would deem an honorable use of an elected official's time. Sorry, these two seats just aren't all that important to this voter (though they likely should be). If Mr. Gallagher can add and subtract, and Ms. O'Malley in reality does seek reform of Denver's voting processes, that's all I need to know.
- Councilmembers At Large: Doug Linkhart and Carol E. Campbell.
Why? Doug Linkhart has voiced his dissatisfaction in both Mr. Hickenlooper's and outgoing Council member Elbra Wedgeworth's track record in tackling the many issues North Denver metro neighborhoods face. He also talks a good talk when it comes to crime. Additionally, he seems sincerely interested in "filling in" and redeveloping the blighted "horseshoe" that still rings the redeveloped downtown to the north (and to which Cole belongs). Finally, he shares my belief that the North Denver neighborhoods like Cole, Whittier, and Curtis Park at this point have enough homeless, drug and alcohol-related shelters--It's time for Highlands, and some of the other urban Denver 'hoods to do their part and host some of these important facilities.
Carol Campbell similarly seems ready to tackle head-on the crime and disorder issues that plague urban Denver. I applaud her for consistently not skirting the issues, or candy-coating her opinions, though I'm sure they open her up for some heated criticisms. For example, she's not been afraid to speak out about the dim-witted Denver tradition of spending police dollars every year to facilitate Cinco de Mayo cruising. Is she being racist in speaking out against Cinco de Mayo cruising, because she's white and the participants are Hispanic? No, she's not, because it's not about race. I don't care if they were Starbucks-drinking yuppies blasting Yanni in their 3-series BMW's, cruising is a bona fide problem, that adversely affects residents and businesses along the Federal corridor. I lived over there, and know first-hand how hard it is to even get out of your block to go to the Safeway for a gallon of milk on that day every year--Not to mention the residual beer and liquor bottles residents are left to clean up for weeks afterwards. And this is a problem that affects all residents over there--black, white, hispanic, rich and poor.
So, because Carol Campbell appears to be a straight-shooter that has lived "on the front lines" of urban Denver, and doesn't think the current disorder and crime situation should be tolerated, she'll get my vote.
Council Member District 8: Carla Madison.
What played into my decision? Well, for me, first and foremost I want a candidate that is available and responsive--In other words, the anti-Elbra.
Next, for this voter, crime and public safety top my list of issues, followed closely by the need to attract more and better businesses to Cole. Thus, my evaluations of the candidates were shaped by these key issues. You might have other hotbuttons, and as such, do your own reading on these candidates (you'll find links to many of their websites in this post and on the right side of the page) and make the pick that is right for you.
I really wanted to vote for a candidate of color for District 8, given the diversity of our district, but I haven't been able to get all that excited about any one candidate, except perhaps Ms. Madison. As such, on this one, I'm going to start with the other candidates before explaining where in my mind they fell short, before I share why I feel Carla is the best choice:
Lynn Smith has a lot of good things to say, particularly regarding redevelopment and zoning, but as a write-in candidate, I don't know that she has a real chance of winning, so I think voting for her would most likely just be taking away a vote that could potentially keep Sharon Bailey out of office (more on that later).
I initially was leaning towards voting for Darrell Watson, because even as a person of color, he has done enough homework to embrace Broken Windows. I am impressed with his work on the Biased Policing Task Force, where he opened dialog between residents and police to solve distrust and profiling concerns, rather than just throwing stones--as in my opinion the CPC is currently doing in response to the Cole-Whittier Against Crime initiative. His resume is similarly strengthened because of his leadership of the Whittier neighborhood association, which from the outside appears to be a very organized, effective organization. I also appreciate his interest in smart redevelopment through support of local businesses. The fact that he is a cyclist doesn't hurt, either. Finally, again given the diversity of our district, I think that it would be wonderful to have an African-American, openly gay city council member.
However, every time I've heard him speak, he makes some big promises that he's going to have a lot of trouble keeping (like saying if elected, he'll get the decision to use streetcars instead of light rail to connect the Downtown transit system to the new 40th/40th station overturned--Not try, he'll "get it done"). Also, his speeches are so rehearsed that to me he seems insincere, which leaves me uncomfortable about what he'd be like if elected. I don't vote for scripted, rehearsed politicians, I vote for real people that I can relate to, and I can't say for me that is Darrell Watson.
But the final straw was when I started receiving unsolicited campaign emails from Mr. Watson. I'm guessing he obtained my address from a neighborhood association list (which makes me wonder who provided it to him as well), but I know I never asked for emails from him. I was able to unsubscribe, but my personal email to Mr. Watson stating my unhappiness with his action went unanswered. Not encouraging from a potential elected official, so I crossed him off the list.
Greg Rasheed was a close third pick for me initially, but after further thought I had to move him up to a very close second. While he has said he clearly has concerns about Broken Windows, he seems to understand there is a real crime problem in the area. He makes a good case for investing in programs for youth in our community, to better recognize the many very bright and talented kids that otherwise seem to go unnoticed due to economics, race, and what school district they belong to. Though I don't have children, I have to admit at times it's tough in this neighborhood seeing how little praise, how little encouragement, and how little positive reinforcement and guidance children in Cole seem to get. I agree whole-heartedly that any long-term solution to the gang and youth crime problem needs to include positive, youth-targeted programs and activities.
I also get the feeling that despite Mr. Rasheed's steadfast belief in strengthening our communities through investment in and nurturing of our youth, he seems to understand, like I do, that youth programs and community programs alone won't fix the crime problem in District 8.
Interestingly, I was unable to learn much about his positions on some key topics as each time he spoke at the public forums, he ran out of time before he really got "warmed up" and to the meat and potatoes of his points. His website, too, was a little light on real information to me. But, to his credit, he seems to be infinitely available (which is refreshing, and hopefully would translate into similar approachability should he be elected), as evidenced by his prompt reply to this, and other blogs that have mentioned him in the days leading up to the elections. So you need to dig a little deeper to see where he stands on some things, but that information is out there.
A very big thumbs up for Mr. Rasheed's availability and responsiveness to nerdy bloggers like me--In doing my research, I don't think I found one blog dealing with this election where Mr. Rasheed hadn't taken the time to write a personal response (or several). And he certainly has been quick to respond to posts on Coleneighborhood.net. While he didn't end up being my pick, I am becoming more and more confident that Mr. Rasheed would be a fantastic selection by the voters.
Sharon Bailey looks good on paper, I guess, but once she opens her mouth I want to leave the room or change the channel. She goes on and on and on about how she's the most qualified candidate, how she did this, how she did that, etc. etc., blah blah blah. She's very proud of herself, in my opinion, too much so, and as such reminds me of Elbra Wedgeworth, who, no secret here, I despise for her lack of action and accountability in District 8. I'm concerned that Ms. Bailey similarly has some sort of personal agenda that she'll start to serve during her term if elected, at the expense of the district (a la Elbra).
Which brings us to Carla. Why do I like Carla? First, she isn't a great public speaker. I know what you're thinking: Why support someone because they didn't take the time or initiative to attend a Toastmasters class a couple times before running for public office? Well for me, while I wish for her own sake she was a bit more polished behind the microphone, I feel rock solid that what you see is what you get with Carla Madison--And that makes all the difference too me. I don't expect a city council member to be slick, or necessarily have all the answers--I'm more looking to someone with similar values and a sincere willingness to work with their constituency to make tangible change a reality in the district. (Incidentally, as my wife pointed out to me, and as I verified via Youtube, it seems Ms. Madison is beginning to find her voice behind the microphone, as her later speeches seem much better articulated--while still sounding very genuine--than her earlier ones).
She has also been the most visible candidate in Cole over the last few months--Attending neighborhood meetings (not just the one where all the candidates were present to give their sales pitch), Manual High School planning meetings, Cole-Whittier Against Crime Meetings, and other community events.
She supports Broken Windows; believes in "smart" redevelopment of historic neighborhoods like Cole, while maintaining the historical and architectural character; and she has a strong track-record of leadership at the neighborhood level as president and involved member of her City Park neighborhood association. So for me, she scores highly relative to my beliefs on safety and redevelopment, as well as education, and as such, she'll get my vote.
These are just my picks--I encourage everyone to spend a couple hours with Google and do their own homework and vote accordingly. Whomever you pick, VOTE! And the bottom line is realistically that any of the above candidates will be an improvement over Elbra Wedgeworth, who in my opinion checked out years ago.
I'm excited to see who the residents of District 8 pick--And even more excited to see what we can achieve in this district with a councilperson that is sincerely committed to positive change.
Thanks for reading.
Saturday, April 21, 2007
Cole-Whittier Against Crime community meeting: April 23rd, 6PM, Mitchell Elementary
Sorry for the delay in putting out any substantive posts lately. Needless to say a lot has been happening though with the police collaboration initiative (now called Cole-Whittier Against Crime), the corresponding public safety survey, and the upcoming neighborhood cleanup in Cole (Saturday, May 12th).
Anyway, wanted to get something out online about the upcoming Cole-Whittier Against Crime meeting. This Monday, April 23rd, 6PM, Mitchell Elementary.
And get your mail-in ballots in ASAP for the upcoming city elections!
Anyway, wanted to get something out online about the upcoming Cole-Whittier Against Crime meeting. This Monday, April 23rd, 6PM, Mitchell Elementary.
And get your mail-in ballots in ASAP for the upcoming city elections!
Friday, April 06, 2007
Denver City Council District 8 Candidate Forum
From the recent Cole Neighborhood Association Meeting. Check the candidates out and you be the judge:
http://denverdirect.blogspot.com/2007/03/candidates-for-denver-city-council.html
Thanks go out to Denver Direct for putting these all together on one easy-to-find website/blog.
http://denverdirect.blogspot.com/2007/03/candidates-for-denver-city-council.html
Thanks go out to Denver Direct for putting these all together on one easy-to-find website/blog.
Tuesday, April 03, 2007
Cole/Whittier Community-Police Collaboration Meeting: April 9th
Please join us Monday, April 9th, at 6PM at Mitchell Elementary (1350 E. 33rd Avenue) for the latest in a series of collaborative community meetings to help shape what the new Community Safety Plan will look like in Cole-Whittier. We've made huge strides over the last few meetings, but need the cooperation and input from as many residents as possible. Some potential topics for discussion:
- Help finalize the Community Safety Survey and plan for survey distribution
- Review current neighborhood safety data
- Work with other residents and DPD to envision the implementation of the new community safety plan
We need more residents to be involved in the planning process to ensure this program's success--And whatever your vision is for Cole-Whittier--Whether it's large-scale redevelopment, increased commerce and services, improved healthcare services or education--It all starts with community safety and crime prevention.
For more information, contact Karla Loaiza at 720.276.1492.
We hope to see you there.
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Another take on Gentrification, Courtesy of "In Shaw"
My wife made me aware of a great blog by a woman in the Washington D.C. area that talks a lot about redeveloping urban neighborhoods, and gentrification in general. For anyone with an opinion on gentrification, especially those out there that see it as an evil to be avoided, and those that see gentrification as a crusade by rich white people to displace residents of color, I highly recommend checking it out. Below is an excerpt from one of her posts, or you can visit the blog here.
And big thanks to my wife for turning me onto this great blog. Oh, and for Mari, the author of this great blog, for so well articulating the many issues and points of view regarding gentrification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, July 14, 2003
Confessions of a gentrifier I don't fit the normal profile of a gentifier..... First, I'm not rich. On a yearly basis, if not more often my profession's listserv goes on a tizzy about how we're never paid much. according to some government tables I make about 1/2 of the region's adverage income. Second, I'm black. Of course some may want to take away my black person card because of the crew I hang with and I know I'm never going to win a Blacker than Thou contest. It says black on the birth certificate, so that's what I'm sticking with. Third, well there is no 3rd. But I like things to have a begining, a middle and an end. I do fit some of the gentifying stereotypes in otherways: I'm new, moving in in 2000 I have a graduate degree I'm young (sort of) I've improved my yard and house I attend community meetings and support changes I have no kids I am a homeowner I moved to Shaw because a) it is on the Green Line which will take me to Archives II, where I thought I would wind up working. b) not far from the Yellow line, which would take me to Braddock Road, where I did wind up working, c) near grocery store, laundry and everything else a car-less person needs, and lastly and most importantly d) I could afford it. I'm a single woman, there is only so much house I can afford. I don't like huge condo buildings, actually I hate condo buildings. Also I needed to be near the metro, as mentioned previously, I don't have a car. Not a condo, near the metro, equals expensive. But my Realtor found something in my small measly price range. All you new people just want to come in and change things! That's what I hear everyso often from several of the old timers. Old timers have been in the neighborhood since the Indians were fishing in the Potomac. They'll lash out against people who have lived in the neighborhood 15 years, which apparently makes you a newbie still. The old timers are typically old retired women, who insult you in that being nice but insulting way. I didn't move in with a plan. I was aware of changes and potential and I am supportive of it. Change is going to happen. People who have been here 15 years and want change do see an opening and are acting on it using some of the engery (and naivite) of the new people. So yes, I guess in some ways I do want to change things. ** Cut down on liquor stores Good Lord, how many of these stores do you need. Right where I am there are about 3 stores in a 2 block radius where I can grab a 40, or some Mad Dog 20/20. I'm not against beer and wine. I drink wine but you won't find me in the neighborhood liquor store, unless they start carrying a variety of foreign and domestic red wines, none of that Boones Farm crap but real wine. **Do something about abandoned buildings Do old timers like abandoned buildings? It brings joy to my heart so see a house that previously was boarded up getting fixed up to be sold. Now people with the money to fix up houses also are up on the current economic realities and know that they can make some money and they do. They'll fix up a house and sell it for an outragous price. Usually out of the price range of most lower and middle income folks. Heck even Manna fixed then sold houses that were out of my price range. So fixing up the abandoned buildings come at a price. ** Cut down on crime Can't we all agree on this? Apparently not. Some newbie neighbors attended a meeting where she was attacked for wanted greater police presence on her street. The attendees told her if she wanted police presence she should have moved to Georgetown! **Spend money in the community I would like to spend more of my hard earned dollars in the immediate area of where I live but I have 2 questions: 1. Are you selling what I want to be buying? 2. Will I be treated with respect? One old timer chastised the group for not supporting Black businesses and the businesses that have been here since forever. Well I would support those businesses if they sold something I wanted to buy. See the comment about the liquor stores. They aren't selling what I want, and I am not going to buy what I don't want. I want fresh fruit. I want variety. Secondly, I don't want to be treated like a criminal before I even walk into the store. I know the neighborhood was not and in some spots is not safe enough to remove the plexiglass between the cashier and the customer. But I find the whole experience insulting in some ways, so given a choice, I choose not to but myself through that. I choose to go to Giant on P Street. They have what I want, they don't insult me (the cashier may ingore me, but not insult me), and I get to spend my dollars in Shaw. I also support Chain Reaction. The service is good, the prices okay, and most importantly they're close. I don't eat at any of the take out joints, this goes back to the not selling what I want. I would like a nice sit down place, and I have yet to try the Italian restaurant on New York Ave, but that is still far. The best I can do is the Wendy's on Florida, which also is far, but they have the Wendy's Jr. Cheeseburger. If a store or restaurant that was nice and clean and respectful opened up I may visit it and maybe even patronize it. They're are some things that I and my fellow newbies do that are threatening to the old timers and anti-gentrifiers, and I'll try owning up to them. ***You're trying to move people out of their homes. Yes and no. Are these the loud drug dealers down the street? They why hell yes, I want them gone. The old timers may remember when Soinso was a cute little kid, but now he's 20 and is hanging with a dope selling crew. They may feel sorry for them. Newbies show up and they just see the dope selling crew, not the cute kids they were. Sadly, some of these dealers work out of their grandmothers/momma's/girlfriend's house and when a community of law abiding citizens set they're mind to it it becomes "get rid of them all and let G-d, sort them out." Even in situations where it isn't drugs but quality of life issues like noise and trash people look at it as a problem to be fixed and the easiest solution is to get rid of the problem instead of changing the behavior. Section 8. That tends to be synomous with problem house. They're are some good Section 8 people, but if a house has 12 people running in and out of it at all hours; people putting all their business out there on the street; children running around like they don't have any home training; being loud; being bad; being ugly, people just call it a Section 8 house. So yes, those people are targeted. However there are people who are pushed out because of higher taxes and rents. They are not targeted, they are just victims of the changing economic times. Of course, according to Lance Freeman,at Columbia University, and Frank Braconi, at the Citizens Housing and Planning Council people aren't pushed out (see New York Times 3/26/2002 The Big City; The Gentry, Misjudged As Neighbors by JOHN TIERNEY ). They were bound to leave anyway regardless of what was going on in that particular neighborhood.
And big thanks to my wife for turning me onto this great blog. Oh, and for Mari, the author of this great blog, for so well articulating the many issues and points of view regarding gentrification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, July 14, 2003
Confessions of a gentrifier I don't fit the normal profile of a gentifier..... First, I'm not rich. On a yearly basis, if not more often my profession's listserv goes on a tizzy about how we're never paid much. according to some government tables I make about 1/2 of the region's adverage income. Second, I'm black. Of course some may want to take away my black person card because of the crew I hang with and I know I'm never going to win a Blacker than Thou contest. It says black on the birth certificate, so that's what I'm sticking with. Third, well there is no 3rd. But I like things to have a begining, a middle and an end. I do fit some of the gentifying stereotypes in otherways: I'm new, moving in in 2000 I have a graduate degree I'm young (sort of) I've improved my yard and house I attend community meetings and support changes I have no kids I am a homeowner I moved to Shaw because a) it is on the Green Line which will take me to Archives II, where I thought I would wind up working. b) not far from the Yellow line, which would take me to Braddock Road, where I did wind up working, c) near grocery store, laundry and everything else a car-less person needs, and lastly and most importantly d) I could afford it. I'm a single woman, there is only so much house I can afford. I don't like huge condo buildings, actually I hate condo buildings. Also I needed to be near the metro, as mentioned previously, I don't have a car. Not a condo, near the metro, equals expensive. But my Realtor found something in my small measly price range. All you new people just want to come in and change things! That's what I hear everyso often from several of the old timers. Old timers have been in the neighborhood since the Indians were fishing in the Potomac. They'll lash out against people who have lived in the neighborhood 15 years, which apparently makes you a newbie still. The old timers are typically old retired women, who insult you in that being nice but insulting way. I didn't move in with a plan. I was aware of changes and potential and I am supportive of it. Change is going to happen. People who have been here 15 years and want change do see an opening and are acting on it using some of the engery (and naivite) of the new people. So yes, I guess in some ways I do want to change things. ** Cut down on liquor stores Good Lord, how many of these stores do you need. Right where I am there are about 3 stores in a 2 block radius where I can grab a 40, or some Mad Dog 20/20. I'm not against beer and wine. I drink wine but you won't find me in the neighborhood liquor store, unless they start carrying a variety of foreign and domestic red wines, none of that Boones Farm crap but real wine. **Do something about abandoned buildings Do old timers like abandoned buildings? It brings joy to my heart so see a house that previously was boarded up getting fixed up to be sold. Now people with the money to fix up houses also are up on the current economic realities and know that they can make some money and they do. They'll fix up a house and sell it for an outragous price. Usually out of the price range of most lower and middle income folks. Heck even Manna fixed then sold houses that were out of my price range. So fixing up the abandoned buildings come at a price. ** Cut down on crime Can't we all agree on this? Apparently not. Some newbie neighbors attended a meeting where she was attacked for wanted greater police presence on her street. The attendees told her if she wanted police presence she should have moved to Georgetown! **Spend money in the community I would like to spend more of my hard earned dollars in the immediate area of where I live but I have 2 questions: 1. Are you selling what I want to be buying? 2. Will I be treated with respect? One old timer chastised the group for not supporting Black businesses and the businesses that have been here since forever. Well I would support those businesses if they sold something I wanted to buy. See the comment about the liquor stores. They aren't selling what I want, and I am not going to buy what I don't want. I want fresh fruit. I want variety. Secondly, I don't want to be treated like a criminal before I even walk into the store. I know the neighborhood was not and in some spots is not safe enough to remove the plexiglass between the cashier and the customer. But I find the whole experience insulting in some ways, so given a choice, I choose not to but myself through that. I choose to go to Giant on P Street. They have what I want, they don't insult me (the cashier may ingore me, but not insult me), and I get to spend my dollars in Shaw. I also support Chain Reaction. The service is good, the prices okay, and most importantly they're close. I don't eat at any of the take out joints, this goes back to the not selling what I want. I would like a nice sit down place, and I have yet to try the Italian restaurant on New York Ave, but that is still far. The best I can do is the Wendy's on Florida, which also is far, but they have the Wendy's Jr. Cheeseburger. If a store or restaurant that was nice and clean and respectful opened up I may visit it and maybe even patronize it. They're are some things that I and my fellow newbies do that are threatening to the old timers and anti-gentrifiers, and I'll try owning up to them. ***You're trying to move people out of their homes. Yes and no. Are these the loud drug dealers down the street? They why hell yes, I want them gone. The old timers may remember when Soinso was a cute little kid, but now he's 20 and is hanging with a dope selling crew. They may feel sorry for them. Newbies show up and they just see the dope selling crew, not the cute kids they were. Sadly, some of these dealers work out of their grandmothers/momma's/girlfriend's house and when a community of law abiding citizens set they're mind to it it becomes "get rid of them all and let G-d, sort them out." Even in situations where it isn't drugs but quality of life issues like noise and trash people look at it as a problem to be fixed and the easiest solution is to get rid of the problem instead of changing the behavior. Section 8. That tends to be synomous with problem house. They're are some good Section 8 people, but if a house has 12 people running in and out of it at all hours; people putting all their business out there on the street; children running around like they don't have any home training; being loud; being bad; being ugly, people just call it a Section 8 house. So yes, those people are targeted. However there are people who are pushed out because of higher taxes and rents. They are not targeted, they are just victims of the changing economic times. Of course, according to Lance Freeman,at Columbia University, and Frank Braconi, at the Citizens Housing and Planning Council people aren't pushed out (see New York Times 3/26/2002 The Big City; The Gentry, Misjudged As Neighbors by JOHN TIERNEY ). They were bound to leave anyway regardless of what was going on in that particular neighborhood.
Monday, March 26, 2007
Good riddance, Elbra
I caught a little of the March 20th District 8 City Council Candidate Forum tonight on TV, and I have to say that each one of the candidates at least appears to have good intentions about actually making a difference in the district.
But each one of them should be sending outgoing councilwoman Elbra Wedgeworth a thank-you card for setting the bar so low on what is expected of them. While I understand why the current candidates are being diplomatic to Ms. Wedgeworth in warm, fuzzy statements like they'll "be proud to continue the tradition of excellence" she set, if one of them called her out for the stinking pile of (expletive) she has turned out to be as an ambassador for District 8, they'd instantly get my vote.
Can someone tell me something that Ms. Wedgeworth has actually contributed to this district in the last five years? Anyone? Heck, even her website suggests she checked out several years ago. (I can't find anything of note that she is bragging about that has happened since 2003.)
And don't tell me about the Democratic National Convention. While it's certainly arguable that the convention coming to Denver will benefit the city as a whole, I think it's unforgivable how Ms. Wedgeworth has taken her eye off her entire reason for being elected--SPECIFICALLY helping District 8--to chase around the Hillary Clinton crowd.
Now I know someone is going to say "Downtown is part of District 8, and thus she's helping District 8 by bringing in the Democratic National Convention." Okay, let's do a little comparison. Spend the morning walking around the 16th Street Mall, then the afternoon walking around Cole, Whittier, and the rest of District 8. Who needs the help here?
What about the education issues on the forefront of residents' minds? Crime? Violence? Graffiti? Poverty and health services? I wonder if Ms. Wedgeworth needs to read her own website to remind her exactly which district she represented. "Oh, right, District 8, I was way off!"
I can speak for it first-hand: I'm currently working with the promoters of an upcoming bicycling event in Curtis Park. Our organization contacted Ms. Wedgeworth to gain her office's support and assistance in making sure the event will be a successful, and sustainable one. We explained that the event is intended to spotlight Curtis Park and other redeveloping North Denver neighborhoods and businesses; provide a healthy, constructive event for underserved local residents; and even offers free bicycle helmets to children whose parents can't afford them. Ms Wedgeworth's response? That she didn't have time to even think about helping.
Again, can someone tell me some tangibile contribution Ms. Wedgeworth has made since Friends went off the air? She checked out so long ago, it's laughable.
She can't even maintain a basic facade of being engaged by keeping her website current.
I can't wait to see what we can actually achieve in this district when one of the new candidates (Carla Madison, Darrell Watson, Greg Rasheed, Lynne Smith, and Sharon Bailey) gets elected.
You can learn more about them here.
While I have picked my candidate, I've realized that any one of them, if they at least show up for work, will be a significant step forward for District 8 over the neglect we've endured under Ms. Wedgeworth.
Good luck with your convention, Elbra.
But each one of them should be sending outgoing councilwoman Elbra Wedgeworth a thank-you card for setting the bar so low on what is expected of them. While I understand why the current candidates are being diplomatic to Ms. Wedgeworth in warm, fuzzy statements like they'll "be proud to continue the tradition of excellence" she set, if one of them called her out for the stinking pile of (expletive) she has turned out to be as an ambassador for District 8, they'd instantly get my vote.
Can someone tell me something that Ms. Wedgeworth has actually contributed to this district in the last five years? Anyone? Heck, even her website suggests she checked out several years ago. (I can't find anything of note that she is bragging about that has happened since 2003.)
And don't tell me about the Democratic National Convention. While it's certainly arguable that the convention coming to Denver will benefit the city as a whole, I think it's unforgivable how Ms. Wedgeworth has taken her eye off her entire reason for being elected--SPECIFICALLY helping District 8--to chase around the Hillary Clinton crowd.
Now I know someone is going to say "Downtown is part of District 8, and thus she's helping District 8 by bringing in the Democratic National Convention." Okay, let's do a little comparison. Spend the morning walking around the 16th Street Mall, then the afternoon walking around Cole, Whittier, and the rest of District 8. Who needs the help here?
What about the education issues on the forefront of residents' minds? Crime? Violence? Graffiti? Poverty and health services? I wonder if Ms. Wedgeworth needs to read her own website to remind her exactly which district she represented. "Oh, right, District 8, I was way off!"
I can speak for it first-hand: I'm currently working with the promoters of an upcoming bicycling event in Curtis Park. Our organization contacted Ms. Wedgeworth to gain her office's support and assistance in making sure the event will be a successful, and sustainable one. We explained that the event is intended to spotlight Curtis Park and other redeveloping North Denver neighborhoods and businesses; provide a healthy, constructive event for underserved local residents; and even offers free bicycle helmets to children whose parents can't afford them. Ms Wedgeworth's response? That she didn't have time to even think about helping.
Again, can someone tell me some tangibile contribution Ms. Wedgeworth has made since Friends went off the air? She checked out so long ago, it's laughable.
She can't even maintain a basic facade of being engaged by keeping her website current.
I can't wait to see what we can actually achieve in this district when one of the new candidates (Carla Madison, Darrell Watson, Greg Rasheed, Lynne Smith, and Sharon Bailey) gets elected.
You can learn more about them here.
While I have picked my candidate, I've realized that any one of them, if they at least show up for work, will be a significant step forward for District 8 over the neglect we've endured under Ms. Wedgeworth.
Good luck with your convention, Elbra.
Saturday, March 24, 2007
Join us at the March Cole Neighborhood Association Meeting!
Residents, come join our growing group at the next Cole Neighborhood Association Meeting, March 29th, 2007 at 3280 Downing Street, from 5:30-8:00 PM.
This is a special meeting, where we'll get the chance to meet our district's candidates for city council. A tentative schedule is below. Hope to see you there--And bring some of your neighbors!
5:30-6:00 p.m. – Meet-and-greet
6:00-7:00 p.m. – Each candidate will have 10 minutes (10x6=60 min)
* 4 minutes to make a speech, 6 minutes for Q&A
* All residents' questions must be written on index cards and submitted to the moderator by
5:59 p.m. Questions will be edited by the moderator for clarity/brevity.
7:00-7:15 p.m. – Each candidate will have two minutes for a conclusion.
7:15-8:00 p.m. – Community-wide dialogue with neighborhood police officers on issues around the implementation of the Broken Windows program.
This is a special meeting, where we'll get the chance to meet our district's candidates for city council. A tentative schedule is below. Hope to see you there--And bring some of your neighbors!
5:30-6:00 p.m. – Meet-and-greet
6:00-7:00 p.m. – Each candidate will have 10 minutes (10x6=60 min)
* 4 minutes to make a speech, 6 minutes for Q&A
* All residents' questions must be written on index cards and submitted to the moderator by
5:59 p.m. Questions will be edited by the moderator for clarity/brevity.
7:00-7:15 p.m. – Each candidate will have two minutes for a conclusion.
7:15-8:00 p.m. – Community-wide dialogue with neighborhood police officers on issues around the implementation of the Broken Windows program.
Friday, March 16, 2007
Denver Digs Street Trees Sale 2007
One of the most shocking differences between Cole Neighborhood and our old neighborhood of The Highlands is the lack of mature trees. Whereas in the highlands one finds cool, shady, lush (at least for the desert) tree-lined streets, here in Cole most of our blocks are home to two or three trees at best. And those that exist are either relatively young, or elderly trees suffering from years upon years of neglect. Worse yet, it seems that two out of every three trees down here is the dreaded alanthus, Denver's ubiquitous weed tree.Head toward City Park to the east, and you again find tree-lined, shady streets. But not much in Cole.
While I've heard people talk about some sort of "tree blight" in this part of the city, I've been thus unable to find any reference to it, despite dedicated efforts by my good friend Google. But it seems clear to me something over here killed the trees.
What are the consequences for current Cole residents? Well, beyond the obvious aesthetics, there is less shade to filter the brutal Colorado sun, meaning our streets, sidewalks, gardens and yards soak in (and then radiate back) more heat during the summer. Having no shade on our streets drives residents inside in the summertime, reducing the communal quality of life most urban residents prize. Our lawns and gardens require more precious water, and many hell strips simply dry up and blow away. From a wastewater standpoint, trees are a tremendous asset--A study in 1998 suggested that Denver's urban tree canopy at the time provided equivalent value to a 21 million dollar wastewater facility. And finally, we're missing out on trees' inherent ability to filter a tremendous amount of bad stuff from our air--like sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide. These last two points are especially important given our neighborhood's proximity to two major highways and metro Denver's expanse of streets and parking lots.
So, we don't have enough trees to start with, the ones we have are either near the end of their life cycle, grossly neglected, or inferior weed trees, and no one is making a point of planting new ones. Anyone else see where things are headed? And I won't even play the global warming card that is so in fashion right now.
It's clear that we need to make a point of getting as many residents of the neighborhood to plant (and care for!) a tree. Compared to other campaigns residents champion, what could be easier than planting a new tree? Well, in all fairness, many residents can't afford to go plunk $100 or more down on a new tree, or don't know the first thing about how to select, plant, or care for a tree in Denver's harsh desert climate.
Last year we learned of a fantastic program put on by The Park People, a Denver non-profit committed to maintaining and enhancing Denver's natural beauty, that makes it easy for anyone--anyone--to help enhance our neighborhood by planting a tree.
Each year the Park People have a tree sale on Arbor Day where they sell carefully-selected Denver-friendly trees at fantastic prices , currently from $45 to $65. And these aren't tiny saplings that will start to provide shade in 25 years--Most of these trees are 4-7 feet tall, so they can make an immediate difference to our landscape.
They also come complete with planting and care instructions, to help ensure the best potential for these trees becoming established, healthy residents of Cole.
Even better, Cole neighborhood was selected this year as one of several to qualify for free street trees--Meaning residents that applied were able to take one of several varieties of trees home free of charge, as long as they planted them streetside.
While the deadline has passed to apply for free street trees for 2007, the Park People's annual tree sale is coming up on April 21st (Earth Day) from 9:00-11:30 at six metro Denver locations. Do your part and take the cash you spend each and every month on cable TV or entertainment and make a very tangible contribution to the neighborhood by purchasing and planting a tree. And just as importantly, make sure your neighbors know about the program, too.
The Park People can be reached at 303.722.6262 or info@theparkpeople.org. And of course check out their website: http://theparkpeople.org.
Thanks for reading.
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Local Business Spotlight: Urban Roadhouse and Bluenote Catering
I got criticized by a fellow blogger the other day for making a post about a neighborhood barbecue restaurant, stating that my writings were too "diluted" as a result. Guess I shouldn't waste valuable space supporting a local businesses, when that same space could be spent whining, complaining, and just perpetuating the cynicism and negativity that afflicts our neighborhoods in general.
Oh well, as a relative conservative, I will always see the future of our neighborhood in free enterprise and individuals that lead by doing, rather than sitting around and complaining. And in that spirit, I have to point out that in nearby Curtis Park, we have yet another great neighborhood partner: Urban Roadhouse.
Located on the corner of 27th and Arapahoe, Urban Roadhouse offers North Denver residents fantastic Platte River Roasters brewed coffee (also available by the pound) as well as a diverse selection of breakfast burritoes, sandwiches and salads.
They also offer a full range of catering services from box lunches to full-on on-site catering.
I ate there the other day and enjoyed a generously sized B.L.A.T. (Bacon, lettuce, Avocado and Tomato) and a Pelegrino limonata--A perfect lunch.
Like so many businesses in the area, they're likely 3-4 years from looking like geniuses for opening up where they did--So as always, join me in supporting them. Buy local!
Urban Roadhouse and Bluenote Catering are at 2700 Arapahoe in North Denver. You can call ahead for take out too: 303.291.3347
Oh well, as a relative conservative, I will always see the future of our neighborhood in free enterprise and individuals that lead by doing, rather than sitting around and complaining. And in that spirit, I have to point out that in nearby Curtis Park, we have yet another great neighborhood partner: Urban Roadhouse.
Located on the corner of 27th and Arapahoe, Urban Roadhouse offers North Denver residents fantastic Platte River Roasters brewed coffee (also available by the pound) as well as a diverse selection of breakfast burritoes, sandwiches and salads.
They also offer a full range of catering services from box lunches to full-on on-site catering.
I ate there the other day and enjoyed a generously sized B.L.A.T. (Bacon, lettuce, Avocado and Tomato) and a Pelegrino limonata--A perfect lunch.
Like so many businesses in the area, they're likely 3-4 years from looking like geniuses for opening up where they did--So as always, join me in supporting them. Buy local!
Urban Roadhouse and Bluenote Catering are at 2700 Arapahoe in North Denver. You can call ahead for take out too: 303.291.3347
(Photo courtesy of MileHighBuzz.com)
Broken Windows Policing comes to Cole Neighborhood, Denver
Well, with no shortage of controversy, with the endorsement of the Metro Organization for People the Denver Police Department District 2 are set to begin "Broken Windows" Policing in Cole Neigborhood.
While many residents (like my wife and me) are thrilled to hear of this new focus on improving the climate in our neighborhood of Cole, the announcement of this initiative has brought as much if not more outcry as relief among many residents, in particular, minorities. (It still surprises me that individuals won't speak out or become involved to address the crime problems in our neighborhood, including the recent murder of a college student home visiting his folks, but are so quick to criticize the police department for this initiative, before it has even begun. Whatever the cause, it is certainly a shame that there isn't a better relationship between many residents and the Denver police force, as a partnership between both is essential for the continued progress of the neighborhood. While again many will be quick to point the finger at the police department, I think any reasonable individual will admit the likely true responsibility for this animosity is in reality shared between police and community).
Regardless, residents of Cole owe it to themselves, to the police department they are criticizing, and more importantly, to the rest of the neighborhood to do their homework to truly understand the issue at hand--Not just swallow the party line the police department and MOP are presenting. Similarly, residents should do their homework before jumping on the bandwagon of the critics and borderline activists on the other side of the argument.
I apologize in advance for the length of this post--However, I feel it is a crucial issue for residents to understand, and as such I tried to present the issue in as much entirety as possible. What is my goal? While I have come to my own conclusion on whether Broken Windows is a welcome addition to our neighborhood, I want to provide as much information as possible to individuals seeking it out, so that they may make their own educated assessment. And by educated, I mean seeing both sides of the issue, not just the one that I think gains the most "press", which is the side of the critics.
It's not hard in today's information age to do your homework, and glean enough different points of view from the articles and publications available online to form an educated opinion, yet is it just me, or are people becoming less informed with time, and instead just buying into the most convenient explanation or position on a topic?
While I'm no expert (I'm just a pseudo-intellectual according to one blogger that believes they have this issue all figured out) but I've done enough reading, and attended enough meetings on the issue that I think I can at least present an opinion that is formed through a thorough understanding of both sides of the issue, unlike many.
First off, what is "Broken Windows"?
To initially answer this question, I'll simply point readers to the original article that spawned the "Broken Windows" theory of policing.
Long story short, the theory basically holds that a solution to crime epidemics in many neigborhoods is to fix the problems when they are small. For example, in dealing with vandalism, repair the broken windows within a short time, say, a day or a week, and the tendency is that vandals are much less likely to break more windows or do further damage. Clean up the sidewalk every day, and the tendency is for litter not to accumulate (or for the rate of littering to be much less). Problems do not escalate and thus respectable residents do not flee a neighborhood.
Thus, the theory makes two claims: 1) future petty crime and "nuisance" anti-social behavior will be deterred, and as a result 2) major crime will be prevented.
From what I can tell, most critics of the theory focus their criticism on the second point, as well as a potential increase in police profiling and loss of civil liberties at the hands of the police department.
Former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Robert Cisneros explained the Broken Windows theory in a 1995 essay as purporting "that a certain sequence of events can be expected in deteriorating neighborhoods":
Evidence of decay (accumulated trash, broken windows, deteriorated building exteriors) remains in the neighborhood for a reasonably long period of time. People who live and work in the area feel more vulnerable and begin to withdraw. They become less willing to intervene to maintain public order (for example, to attempt to break up groups of rowdy teens loitering on street corners) or to address physical signs of deterioration. Sensing this, teens and other possible offenders become bolder and intensify their harassment and vandalism. Residents become yet more fearful and withdraw further from community involvement and upkeep. This atmosphere then attracts offenders from outside the area, who sense that it has become a vulnerable and less risky site for crime.
The "broken windows" theory suggests neighborhood strategies such as those listed below help to deter and reduce crime:
While many residents (like my wife and me) are thrilled to hear of this new focus on improving the climate in our neighborhood of Cole, the announcement of this initiative has brought as much if not more outcry as relief among many residents, in particular, minorities. (It still surprises me that individuals won't speak out or become involved to address the crime problems in our neighborhood, including the recent murder of a college student home visiting his folks, but are so quick to criticize the police department for this initiative, before it has even begun. Whatever the cause, it is certainly a shame that there isn't a better relationship between many residents and the Denver police force, as a partnership between both is essential for the continued progress of the neighborhood. While again many will be quick to point the finger at the police department, I think any reasonable individual will admit the likely true responsibility for this animosity is in reality shared between police and community).
Regardless, residents of Cole owe it to themselves, to the police department they are criticizing, and more importantly, to the rest of the neighborhood to do their homework to truly understand the issue at hand--Not just swallow the party line the police department and MOP are presenting. Similarly, residents should do their homework before jumping on the bandwagon of the critics and borderline activists on the other side of the argument.
I apologize in advance for the length of this post--However, I feel it is a crucial issue for residents to understand, and as such I tried to present the issue in as much entirety as possible. What is my goal? While I have come to my own conclusion on whether Broken Windows is a welcome addition to our neighborhood, I want to provide as much information as possible to individuals seeking it out, so that they may make their own educated assessment. And by educated, I mean seeing both sides of the issue, not just the one that I think gains the most "press", which is the side of the critics.
It's not hard in today's information age to do your homework, and glean enough different points of view from the articles and publications available online to form an educated opinion, yet is it just me, or are people becoming less informed with time, and instead just buying into the most convenient explanation or position on a topic?
While I'm no expert (I'm just a pseudo-intellectual according to one blogger that believes they have this issue all figured out) but I've done enough reading, and attended enough meetings on the issue that I think I can at least present an opinion that is formed through a thorough understanding of both sides of the issue, unlike many.
First off, what is "Broken Windows"?
To initially answer this question, I'll simply point readers to the original article that spawned the "Broken Windows" theory of policing.
Long story short, the theory basically holds that a solution to crime epidemics in many neigborhoods is to fix the problems when they are small. For example, in dealing with vandalism, repair the broken windows within a short time, say, a day or a week, and the tendency is that vandals are much less likely to break more windows or do further damage. Clean up the sidewalk every day, and the tendency is for litter not to accumulate (or for the rate of littering to be much less). Problems do not escalate and thus respectable residents do not flee a neighborhood.
Thus, the theory makes two claims: 1) future petty crime and "nuisance" anti-social behavior will be deterred, and as a result 2) major crime will be prevented.
From what I can tell, most critics of the theory focus their criticism on the second point, as well as a potential increase in police profiling and loss of civil liberties at the hands of the police department.
Former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Robert Cisneros explained the Broken Windows theory in a 1995 essay as purporting "that a certain sequence of events can be expected in deteriorating neighborhoods":
Evidence of decay (accumulated trash, broken windows, deteriorated building exteriors) remains in the neighborhood for a reasonably long period of time. People who live and work in the area feel more vulnerable and begin to withdraw. They become less willing to intervene to maintain public order (for example, to attempt to break up groups of rowdy teens loitering on street corners) or to address physical signs of deterioration. Sensing this, teens and other possible offenders become bolder and intensify their harassment and vandalism. Residents become yet more fearful and withdraw further from community involvement and upkeep. This atmosphere then attracts offenders from outside the area, who sense that it has become a vulnerable and less risky site for crime.
The "broken windows" theory suggests neighborhood strategies such as those listed below help to deter and reduce crime:
- Quick replacement of broken windows
- Prompt removal of abandoned vehicles
- Fast clean up of illegally dumped items, litter and spilled garbage
- Quick paint out of graffiti
- Finding (or building) better places for teens to gather than street corners
- Fresh paint on buildings
Clean sidewalks and street gutters"
Seems to make sense, right? I can say that I see a lot of parallels between Mr. Cisneros' "sequence of events" in a deteriorating neighborhood and what I have seen in my six years spent in Denver's redeveloping neighborhoods. There is no doubt in my mind that crime in a neighborhood creates its own momentum if left unchecked. Whether it's littering, public drug use, or worse yet, drug dealing and violence, once the bad guys realize that no one in the neighborhood cares or is going to speak up, and that the police aren't actively enforcing the law in an area, they become increasingly bold.
Want proof? Come into my neighborhood and see individuals urinating in public, walking their un-spayed or neutered, unvaccinated dogs in populated areas without leashes, drinking in public, littering, ignoring traffic laws, even publicly using or dealing drugs, etc. And then acting flabbergasted when someone (like me) complains or calls the cops about their lawlessness. When do people stop caring about obeying the law? Stop caring about reckless or dangerous behavior? Where do you think that apathy starts? It starts with one person doing one of these acts, and not experiencing any consequences (no one complains or corrects them). That's how individuals develop habits, and I'd agree, it's also how neighborhoods do.
So why, you ask, doesn't everyone embrace this form of policing, as it seems to sense, at least on a basic level? It seems like most critics of the theory come up with the following criticisms:
- There is no empirical proof, they say that Broken Windows actually works in reducing crime.
And at first glance, there does seem to be a lack of statistical evidence that Broken Windows policing creates a quantifiable decrease in serious crime (at least until you realize that one of the most-referenced critics, Bernard Harcourt, apparently and possibly intentionally omitted the data from two neighborhoods that potentially would have changed the statistics upon which he bases his entire attack). While the Giuliani administration in New York City, the first adopters of the theory back in the 80's proudly tout a sudden decrease in petty and serious crime after implementation of the theory that continued for 10 years (though even Giuliani suggests Broken Windows was just one prong of a multi-pronged initiative that led to the reduction in crime), critics are quick to point out that many cities in the same period of time, regardless of their policing, saw similar decreases in crime. They also point out that several other factors during the period could have contributed to the drop in crime, like tougher gun laws, a decrease in crack cocaine use, increased employment, and longer prison terms. Additionally, and this makes sense to me, critics point out that correlation doesn't necessarily infer causation. For example, one study I found showed that there was also a correlation between the New York Yankees high winning percentage during the Broken Windows period in NYC and the decrease in crime (The "Broken Yankees" Theory, page 28), but does that mean that the New York Yankees reduced crime in NYC? Even I must admit this makes for interesting thought on the topic.
I suggest you do your own homework: Read some of the criticisms here, here and here.
But unlike the bandwagon critics of Broken Windows, don't miss the articles out there showing that empirical support for broken windows' effectiveness might actually exist, like here, here and better yet, specifically referring to Broken Windows in Denver here. Or Bratton and Kelling's own rebuttal to many of their critics.
And no matter what the critics say, while the issue may be too convoluted to allow us to extract a direct causational relationship between Broken Windows' previous usage and crime reduction in those areas, they can't deny that at minimum a correlation did exist--And even without this data, why is it so hard for anyone to believe that increased enforcement of crime leads to a reduction in crime, or catching more bad guys? Or that actually enforcing the law (it is the law, correct?) is being too totalitarian? Doesn't anyone else feel that littering, public urination, vandalism and in general, reckless behavior takes away from one's quality of life? And I don't buy into the attitude that this type of crap is just what you get living in the city.
2. The second major criticism is that Broken Windows policing increases the potential for racial profiling by police; and that civil liberties are lost in the process. There is a resident in our neighborhood that is convinced this is the case--so much so that she authored a dissertation referring to Broken Windows as The new slave codes. She so believes that Broken Windows is an excuse for the white-dominated Denver Police Department to increase profiling and harassment that she leafletted our last Cole Neighborhood Meeting with her dissertation, and forcefully interrupted the meeting with a vitriolic indictment of Broken Windows, the Denver Police Department, and even MOP. And, in my opinion, alienated many potential supporters of her point of view that might have been in attendance. Interestingly, after her theatrics at the neighborhood meeting, the issue apparently wasn't important enough for her to attend the following open public meetings--Where residents met with police and were encouraged to share their point of view and recommendations for the program. While I passionately disagree with the author's point of view, her dissertation certainly sums up the civil liberties and racial objections to the Broken Windows theory, and thus is worth reading at least for reference. For additional reference, many of the other articles (and critics in general) I find claiming a loss of civil liberties and an increase in profiling with Broken Windows refer to the Los Angeles Police Department's use of the program.
Am I concerned about racial profiling? Of course, as a caucasian male, likely not as much as a person of color. But I'm more concerned about the current trends in our neighborhood, where the drug dealers and gang bangers if anything seem to be gaining strength, despite very positive progress in terms of redevelopment in Cole. I'm from the school of thought that we have a serious problem in Cole, and especially given the apathy of many residents and their current inexplicable willingness to look the other way when crimes are committed, the police are our only hope for improvement. If people think increased enforcement isn't the solution, I'm all ears to hear an alternative.
The resident mentioned above writes in her article:
Now, before we jump to the conclusion that the author of this quote clearly is trying to lead us to, let's consider facts here: According to the Piton Foundation, our neighborhood is 92% African American and Hispanic. With such a majority, there's no secret why the majority of traffic stops and police contacts are with blacks and Hispanics--it very likely is simple statistical probability, not necessarily racial profiling. Would we expect to see whites, comprising 8% of Cole's population being pulled over most of the time?
And with that kind of majority, are you beginning to realize how difficult a task it is the DPD faces, increasing enforcement with an overwhelmingly white police force in an overwhelmingly black and Hispanic area?
But Kelling and the Broken Windows proponents are racists, right? I have to present a quote from Mr. Kelling (from the April 1st, 2000 NY Times), that stands in stark contrast to his reputation among many people of color as a proponent or instigator of racial profiling:
"Special units, such as the street crimes unit and anti-drug operations... can be effective tools, but they can also be troublesome and potentially dangerous. While special units have been important ingredients in the Police Department's crime-reduction efforts, they tend to be remote from neighborhoods and communities.
The second issue is police planning. Police increasingly rely on analysis of crime data, mapping and other methods to develop tactics for addressing specific problems. When they discover that guns are the primary instruments of murder in black neighborhoods, is it racial profiling or smart policing to target anti-gun efforts there?
Resolutions to these issues are possible, but not easy. They involve balancing individual rights with community interests, effectiveness with costs, and the tradeoffs among important values. Getting out of the current political mess, however, is the first step. Police and neighborhood leaders will have to seek each other out aggressively and honestly. Then, they can get back to the business of improving policing."
Again, sound a little different than Kelling is portrayed by Broken Windows critics? Do your own homework folks, the information is out there!
Kelling is all about checks and balances to prevent unilateral and excessive police force. Where do those checks come in? Well, in Denver, the police department are proposing (not being forced to implement, it was their idea) an empirical system of surveys to be taken before, during and each year following Broken Windows implementation, to measure not only arrest rates and traditional statistical measures of police effectiveness, but also community satisfaction and feedback.
Afraid that local residents of color will feel harassed and profiled? Well, as long as they stay involved in the community, and participate in these control processes, that will come out in the wash.
Additionally, despite the DPD's somewhat patchy reputation, according to an article in the Denver Post the largely Hispanic residents of the Westwood neighborhood in Denver seemed happy with their tactics and results in implementing the Broken Windows theory there. One Hispanic resident even went so far as to say that "fears that the 'broken windows' policing method could promote racial profiling should be laid to rest." Jesus Espino, a Westwood youth agreed, saying he welcomes more officers in Westwood because now he and his friends can walk without fear. He said that while police officers do sometimes stop him in the street to ask him where he is going and for his identification, "It don't bother me 'cause I don't do nothing wrong."
How did Broken Windows first come to Denver anyway? First, in 1995 mayor John Hickenlooper hired Broken Windows originator Kelling to bring Broken Windows to Denver. According to the Mayor's original press release, Kelling and his group were to provide "observations and recommendations in the following areas":
- The nature of crime in Denver, its patterns and projections for the future
- The strategies of the Denver Police Department in addressing crime and disorder, including crime analysis capabilities
- Organizational issues in the Denver Police Department that impact crime reduction efforts; internal organizational changes to meet those requirements
- Staffing analysis of the resources required for effective crime reduction efforts; internal organizational changes to meet those requirements
- Recommended anti-crime strategies and performance measures for adoption by the Denver Police Department; implementation strategies
So, while critics grossly oversimplify Kelling's contributions to the Denver Police Department down to simply bringing Broken Windows theory here, it seems clear that he and his group were hired as much for organizational development as for policing strategy. While critics also try to pidgeonhole Kelling and Broken Windows as simply aggressive, even militaristic policing, it again doesn't take much research to learn that there is much more to Broken Windows and its implementation, including:
- Increased foot patrols--Get officers out of their cars and out into the community where they are more visible, more approachable, and closer to the communities in which they work.
- Thus, leading to better communication between police and residents. Officers can become more familiar with who the good and bad guys are in a neighborhood.
- Ongoing empirical analysis of the program, including resident feedback and surveys before, during, and after implementation.
- Police and courts working with the community to devise alternate enforcement and punishments for first offenses (other than just handing out tickets) including community service and increased parent accountability for youth offenses.
- Increased accountability on the part of the Police to demonstrate progress and a reduction in crime.
**If this sounds familiar to you, you were likely at the last MOP/DPD meeting where Broken Windows was discussed, as their goal in bringing in the Broken Windows model is as much about increased communication and interaction between the police and community members as it is increased police presence and enforcement. Sound a bit different than what the critics and media are describing?
Additionally, while as I understand it, it was DPD's initiative that brought Broken Windows to the Westwood Neighborhood, it was our community leaders and MOP that contacted the DPD and asked that they expand the program in Cole--So, contrary to popular belief, DPD isn't imposing this on us--They're simply providing assistance upon the request of our neighborhood. If you're going to get mad at someone about Broken Windows, get mad at MOP (though I hope you don't), or get mad at me (many readers of this blog do), but not the DPD.
Do your homework folks, before dismissing this new initiative by the DPD and MOP. If after doing your own research, if you still don't agree with Broken Windows, that's certainly your choice and your right--But at least at that point you'll have an educated opinion, instead of relying on the largely uninformed critics that use scare tactics and propaganda to maintain an atmosphere of distrust with the Denver Police.
Am I saying that all police officers are good guys? Or that the DPD hasn't had its struggles in the past? Nope, they've had their problems; still do I'm sure; but not all of you that are reading this are honest, law-abiding citizens--that's life folks. But I can speak from first-hand experience, and say unequivocally that the police I've come in contact with in district 2--The ones that are going to be implementing Broken Windows AT OUR REQUEST, not forcing it on us, have been consistently responsive, responsible, and infinitely willing to listen to the residents of Cole and their needs. And if some problems occur, I'm confident there are processes in place to help identify them and bring them to light.
If you don't attend the neighborhood meetings and Broken Windows round tables, and the only way you speak out is by complaining and trying to further polarize the community and the police, then you're not a solution to a problem, you're a problem in itself.
And there lies the biggest potential fallacy in Broken Windows--The DPD will be out practicing increasing community involvement, foot patrols, and enforcement, based on the request of a relatively small percentage of Cole's residents. The other residents, the vast, apathetic majority, aren't asking for increased enforcement and accountability among the police; they're not involved in the community meetings or Broken Windows discussions, and as a result will potentially be blind-sided by the "crackdown". And of course, like the current, mis- or un-informed critics, they'll be the first ones to complain to the media about police harassment and profiling.
Thanks for reading. I hope to see you at the next Cole Neighborhood and Broken Windows planning program March 19th at Manual High at 6PM. And I hope you grab two or three of your neighbors as you head out the door.
Saturday, March 03, 2007
What we're up against
I mistakenly deleted one of my posts, but didn't want to pass up the opportunity to share some comments made by a fellow "blogger" named Erin Rosa, who in my opinion epitomizes the negative, counterproductive and downright argumentative attitude that many residents unfortunately project towards newer, white residents like my wife and me. While in my book, we're responsible, engaged homeowners, we're portrayed as villains:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"With all of your inane bragging in response to one of my old blog posts, I somehow got the impression that you actually lived in a bad neighborhood. But Cole? Give me a break. Five points, sure. But not Cole. 42nd? Try 1st or 2nd. In fact, try keeping a shotgun in your closet (knowing full well that the police wouldn't respond to your calls anyway) just in case a crackhead tries to break down your door again. That scenario is certainly real. (Not I. But if it was, would I win anything?!?)What a hard life you must live. It's hilarious. I always get a chuckle at the privileged pseudo-intellectuals who find novelty in their new ethnic surroundings. How do you do it? How do you shoulder such a responsibility as cleaning up such a hoooorible place without condos and lofts? The modern white man's burden, huh?Of course you like gentrification, because you can afford it. Those who can't would gladly take some crime over being homeless anyday. It doesn't take a genius to figure. Good luck on the whole broken windows thing too. I hear it's done wonders for the people living in Capitol Hill. And by wonders I mean pushing the crack dealers and prostitutes a few blocks East."
YAL (Erin Rosa)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Erin for sharing your infinite wisdom on neighborhoods with me. Funny how defensive some people get when someone doesn't share their opinion? I simply voiced my support for the Denver Police Department and their efforts in our neighborhood, heaven forbid. I forgot that we're all supposed to hate the police, and to maintain our roles as "victims".
Apparently my neighborhood isn't as bad as I thought--I guess it has been almost three weeks since someone got shot (that I know of). Ms. Rosa, you turned a simple exchange of differing opinions into some sort of contest over whose neighborhood is worse. Interesting!
And then you attack me as a "pseudo intellectual" shouldering the "modern white man's burden" (Why play the race card? Because it's the easy way out for narrow-minded individuals, that's why. And I won't even go down the road about how you think it's OK to talk about my race, when I know you'd be quick to cry bloody murder if I were to have made anywhere near the statements you did except about African Americans or Hispanics). And where do lofts come in? Are you stereotyping that white people like lofts or something? Umm, I own a house. Isn't that almost like racial profiling? Oh, and in your other post, is that some sort of jab at me being a cyclist? So you hate cyclists too? Why so much hostility Erin?
I'm sorry you shoulder so much distrust towards the police department, and against white people, and against cyclists, that you fall into the same trap of generalization and prejudice that you claim the DPD is notorious for, and that you insinuate I possess. You don't even know me, but you're sure quick to judge.
You jump to the conclusion that I'm affluent, when in reality my wife and I work extremely hard for our modest home in this neighborhood, and in all reality likely aren't much better off financially than the folks people like you are afraid are going to be displaced. You don't know to what extent I'm involved in our neighborhood--With the neighborhood association, in helping the residents and kids on my block--But with an attitude like you have, I really don't give a rat's ass what you think anyway.
Because I'm used to it. I've learned that "white people like me" aren't supposed to buy old houses in historically minority populated neighborhoods. We're not supposed to clean up the trash, we're not supposed to get involved in the community, and we're certainly not supposed to speak our minds about crime. But sorry, we're here, we're improving the neighborhood, and we're not going anywhere, so deal with it.
It's attitudes like yours that stand in the way of true progress in neighborhoods like ours. Because it's not about race, it's about the universal right to have a good, safe quality of life in your own neighborhood and home. I don't care what nationality or race my neighbors are, as long as they call the police when they witness crime, keep their home nice, and treat me with the same respect I extend to them.
Oh, and I encourage you to do some reading on gentrification and displacement--As there is plenty of evidence out there that the process of gentrification doesn't necessarily lead to widespread displacement, and on the contrary, often enhances the quality of life and stability of lower income individuals and families. Here, for example.
Well, that's if from this "pseudo intellectual".
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"With all of your inane bragging in response to one of my old blog posts, I somehow got the impression that you actually lived in a bad neighborhood. But Cole? Give me a break. Five points, sure. But not Cole. 42nd? Try 1st or 2nd. In fact, try keeping a shotgun in your closet (knowing full well that the police wouldn't respond to your calls anyway) just in case a crackhead tries to break down your door again. That scenario is certainly real. (Not I. But if it was, would I win anything?!?)What a hard life you must live. It's hilarious. I always get a chuckle at the privileged pseudo-intellectuals who find novelty in their new ethnic surroundings. How do you do it? How do you shoulder such a responsibility as cleaning up such a hoooorible place without condos and lofts? The modern white man's burden, huh?Of course you like gentrification, because you can afford it. Those who can't would gladly take some crime over being homeless anyday. It doesn't take a genius to figure. Good luck on the whole broken windows thing too. I hear it's done wonders for the people living in Capitol Hill. And by wonders I mean pushing the crack dealers and prostitutes a few blocks East."
YAL (Erin Rosa)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Erin for sharing your infinite wisdom on neighborhoods with me. Funny how defensive some people get when someone doesn't share their opinion? I simply voiced my support for the Denver Police Department and their efforts in our neighborhood, heaven forbid. I forgot that we're all supposed to hate the police, and to maintain our roles as "victims".
Apparently my neighborhood isn't as bad as I thought--I guess it has been almost three weeks since someone got shot (that I know of). Ms. Rosa, you turned a simple exchange of differing opinions into some sort of contest over whose neighborhood is worse. Interesting!
And then you attack me as a "pseudo intellectual" shouldering the "modern white man's burden" (Why play the race card? Because it's the easy way out for narrow-minded individuals, that's why. And I won't even go down the road about how you think it's OK to talk about my race, when I know you'd be quick to cry bloody murder if I were to have made anywhere near the statements you did except about African Americans or Hispanics). And where do lofts come in? Are you stereotyping that white people like lofts or something? Umm, I own a house. Isn't that almost like racial profiling? Oh, and in your other post, is that some sort of jab at me being a cyclist? So you hate cyclists too? Why so much hostility Erin?
I'm sorry you shoulder so much distrust towards the police department, and against white people, and against cyclists, that you fall into the same trap of generalization and prejudice that you claim the DPD is notorious for, and that you insinuate I possess. You don't even know me, but you're sure quick to judge.
You jump to the conclusion that I'm affluent, when in reality my wife and I work extremely hard for our modest home in this neighborhood, and in all reality likely aren't much better off financially than the folks people like you are afraid are going to be displaced. You don't know to what extent I'm involved in our neighborhood--With the neighborhood association, in helping the residents and kids on my block--But with an attitude like you have, I really don't give a rat's ass what you think anyway.
Because I'm used to it. I've learned that "white people like me" aren't supposed to buy old houses in historically minority populated neighborhoods. We're not supposed to clean up the trash, we're not supposed to get involved in the community, and we're certainly not supposed to speak our minds about crime. But sorry, we're here, we're improving the neighborhood, and we're not going anywhere, so deal with it.
It's attitudes like yours that stand in the way of true progress in neighborhoods like ours. Because it's not about race, it's about the universal right to have a good, safe quality of life in your own neighborhood and home. I don't care what nationality or race my neighbors are, as long as they call the police when they witness crime, keep their home nice, and treat me with the same respect I extend to them.
Oh, and I encourage you to do some reading on gentrification and displacement--As there is plenty of evidence out there that the process of gentrification doesn't necessarily lead to widespread displacement, and on the contrary, often enhances the quality of life and stability of lower income individuals and families. Here, for example.
Well, that's if from this "pseudo intellectual".
Bicycle Racing Coming to North Denver: The Curtis Park Criterium
To my delight both as a North Denver resident and competitive cyclist, I learned this week that the American Cycling Association will be promoting a Curtis Park Criterium on May 28th (Memorial Day) 2007.To fill the void on the racing calendar left when the Rocky Mountain Cycling Omnium moved to later in the racing season, ACA Representative and long-time Colorado racing advocate Beth Wrenn-Estes stepped in to promote this exciting new race.
But what does this mean to non-cyclists, and in particular, Curtis Park, Five Points and Cole Neighborhood residents? First, it is exciting that so many neighborhood kids and families will be exposed to bike racing... right in Curtis Park! Not only that, but the promoters are looking for a way to provide free bike helmets (to keep) for at-need children that participate in the kids races!
It also means a tremendous influx of people (likely 4-600 total) to our redeveloping neighborhoods who normally wouldn't be exposed to all we have to offer right in Denver's backyard. And while I'm clearly biased towards the cycling community, your average cyclist tends to be affluent, well-educated, and committed to a healthy and environmentally-friendly lifestyle--In other words, just the kind of neighbors we need more of in North Denver. And as such, it's an incredible opportunity for positive exposure for our respective neighborhoods.
For years there has been a race in the Golden Triangle (The Bannock Street Criterium), and from what I've heard, many residents and neighborhood advocates felt it was a tremendous asset in showing the rest of Colorado the progress that neighborhood had made during that time. While on a much grander scale, the long-running Philadelphia International Championship (formerly the Corestates U.S. Pro Championship) also played an integral part of the Manayunk neighborhood's rebirth.
Am I dreaming, or over-estimating the effect an amateur bike race could have on our area? Probably, but nothing would please me more than to see this race become a fixture on the Colorado racing calendar, and an annual showcase for North Denver's regenesis.
I've committed to assisting Ms. Wrenn-Estes and the ACA with this event, and welcome any other local residents or businesses that share my excitement to become similarly involved. If this is you, please post a comment and let me know how to reach you, or contact Ms. Wrenn-Estes directly.
I'll have more information on the race, and potential volunteer and sponsorship opportunities soon, so stay tuned.
And as always, thanks for reading, and caring about North Denver neighborhoods like Cole.
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Another Neighborhood Gem: M&D's Barbeque Cafe
I finally stopped into a local eatery that I had been eyeing since we moved into the neighborhood: M&D's Barbeque Cafe. Located on the southeast corner of 28th and Race (I think it's actually Whittier Neighborhood, or maybe City Park West I guess) in a clean, inviting brick building, M&D's is an ironic gem in the midst of the neighborhood's regenesis.
I say ironic, because each time I passed by the place on my bike or walking the dogs, the beautiful building shined like a beacon on an otherwise yet-to-be-renovated block. So much so that I thought it had to be a new business, banking on what the neighborhood was going to become (like us).
Needless to say I was quite surprised to find out that M&D's is actually a veteran of the neighborhood, residing at this very location since they originally opened their doors in 1977. According to the hostess, they renovated in 2003 (and it shows). Their building is so nice, so clean, it almost doesn't do the home-made cooking served within justice, as it wouldn't look out-of-place next to a Chipotle or Starbucks somewhere in suburban hell.
Anyway, I stopped in there the other day for lunch. I have to tell you, don't even go there if you're trying to diet, as a mouth-watering aroma of barbecue sauces greeted me at the door, and at that moment, I knew I was going to have to take in the whole experience (not just a measly salad or something!).
The place was very warm and friendly--A nice, eclectic mix of people that usually bodes well for the food quality--Good eats are a pretty universal language. The hostess greeted us promptly and with a smile, and quickly led us to a half-booth near the back of the dining room. Our server was similarly efficient and friendly in greeting us. We started off with some catfish nuggets for an appetizer, with barbecue sauce to dip. Being quite the chile-head, I ordered the hot barbecue sauce, my friend Christian, who finds Hunts ketchup on the spicier side of things, threw caution into the wind and ordered the medium. I tried them both before settling on the medium myself--While the hot was admirably so, the medium had more depth to the flavor and a sweetness that was familiar to my barbecue experience.
They have everything on the menu from your normal barbecue chicken, ribs, briscuit, catfish, even whiting, but it all sounded good to us. Christian settled on the briscuit sandwich, I had the smoked and marinated barbecue burger, and our late-arriving friend had the catfish plate.
The food turned out to be on par with the friendly service. Christian's briscuit sandwich was "like candy" he said; my smoked burger was unlike anything else I had ever had (and in a good way!); and our other friend seemed content with his catfish as he ate about half of the huge plate.
We were in a hurry, so we didn't take advantage of the extensive, and very tasty selection of home-made desserts they had on the menu. That will have to wait until next time.
So, if you're looking for some tasty southern cooking, some take-out barbecue or even catering for an event, give M&D's Barbecue Cafe a try. I think you'll be glad you did. And of course, you'll be investing in the success of the neighborhood.
Oh, and be sure to tell them you learned about them from The Cole Neighborhood Memoirs.
Thanks for reading.
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Crime in Cole
There won't be any sarcasm or humor in this post. It is with a heavy heart that I write about a tragedy that happened less than a week ago in Cole--In fact, only a few blocks from our home.
I was home the night the shooting occurred--It was like any other night spent at home relaxing with our two rotweillers for me, but only a few blocks away, life was taken from someone that was clearly very special.
Beyond the horror of such a violent crime happening so close by, it is even sadder that a young person with so much potential, and so much love in his heart was the victim. A guy that beat the odds of growing up in Cole, and worked hard to go to college. A guy that gave endlessly to his family and friends. After reading about Gilbert's short time on this earth, I find myself feeling guilty for not giving of myself more to my loved ones, despite having nearly twice the time to do so than Gilbert had. Please join me in keeping Gilbert's family in your thoughts, as their lives have been profoundly changed forever--in an instant by a yet unidentified, small-minded individual.
I really don't know what to say, other than I hope that whomever did this somehow is found. I'm probably not taking the most mature position when I say this, but personally, I think if the idiots that participate in gangs want to kill each other, go for it--that's natural selection--But leave the innocent, and beautiful individuals like Gilbert out of it. What did he ever do to deserve this? Nothing. Nada. Zip.
Awkward Segue--Hearing about this murder made me think: People often ask us if we feel "safe" in Cole Neighborhood, and we don't hesitate to say yes. Maybe we've become accustomed to the dark side of city life after 6 years in urban Denver, but most of the things we witness in Cole are relatively benign nuisances more than anything that we truly fear. Do bad things happen over here? Of course. As anyone (honest) that has lived in the city (any city) will admit, shit happens there. Cars or homes get broken into, there is drug activity, or worse, someone gets hurt or killed from time to time.
What many people fail to realize or admit, however, is that shit happens everywhere, even in sterile, cookie-cutter Highlands Ranch, or even sleepy Golden, Colorado. Heck, it even happens in podunk Laingsburg, Michigan, where I grew up. But I'm the first to admit that it happens more often in the city.
But we've lived in Cole now for about a year-and-a-half, and have been consistently amazed at how quiet it has proven to be relative to our last residence on 32nd Avenue and Zuni in the Highlands. I tell everyone without embellishment that in the four years we lived there, I witnessed enough criminal behavior to earn me the opportunity to be the "eyewitness" on every episode of COPS.
Now anyone that knows Denver knows that Highlands is "The Place To Be" and Cole still has a ways to go to catch up with the rapid pace of gentrification there. So why is it more quiet in Cole?
Honestly, we're on a relatively quiet block. Anyone that knows Denver also knows how "pocketed" the city is--Meaning you can walk through a neighborhood and block to block go from a quiet, pretty street with well-kept houses to a block that looks like it came right out of Boyz In The Hood. While we were on a major thoroughfare in the Highlands, and in sight of one of the city's eleventy-billion liquor stores, we're on a quieter side street; and as we're learning, one of the better side streets in the neighborhood.
So how does Cole really compare to other urban Denver neighborhoods then? I wonder that a lot, given the wide range of people's perceptions of our neighborhood, and especially when something bad happens like last Thursday. Some of my friends think we're nuts for living over here, but others see the potential and vitality that we do.
It's a hard question to answer. As a visitor to this site pointed out the other day, there isn't much information about Cole, or the other neighborhoods, let alone real hard facts on crime, available online. I did find a great website put together by a realtor specializing in Metro Denver that has a wealth of information about Denver neighborhoods, and crime statistics for metro Denver and surrounding suburbs.
But, based on their data for 2005, our modest neighborhood finished a distant 42nd out of the 78 neighborhoods listed, in terms of "number of incidents" (crimes). What neighborhoods of note had more "incidents" than Cole's 532 in 2005?
What many people fail to realize or admit, however, is that shit happens everywhere, even in sterile, cookie-cutter Highlands Ranch, or even sleepy Golden, Colorado. Heck, it even happens in podunk Laingsburg, Michigan, where I grew up. But I'm the first to admit that it happens more often in the city.
But we've lived in Cole now for about a year-and-a-half, and have been consistently amazed at how quiet it has proven to be relative to our last residence on 32nd Avenue and Zuni in the Highlands. I tell everyone without embellishment that in the four years we lived there, I witnessed enough criminal behavior to earn me the opportunity to be the "eyewitness" on every episode of COPS.
Now anyone that knows Denver knows that Highlands is "The Place To Be" and Cole still has a ways to go to catch up with the rapid pace of gentrification there. So why is it more quiet in Cole?
Honestly, we're on a relatively quiet block. Anyone that knows Denver also knows how "pocketed" the city is--Meaning you can walk through a neighborhood and block to block go from a quiet, pretty street with well-kept houses to a block that looks like it came right out of Boyz In The Hood. While we were on a major thoroughfare in the Highlands, and in sight of one of the city's eleventy-billion liquor stores, we're on a quieter side street; and as we're learning, one of the better side streets in the neighborhood.
So how does Cole really compare to other urban Denver neighborhoods then? I wonder that a lot, given the wide range of people's perceptions of our neighborhood, and especially when something bad happens like last Thursday. Some of my friends think we're nuts for living over here, but others see the potential and vitality that we do.
It's a hard question to answer. As a visitor to this site pointed out the other day, there isn't much information about Cole, or the other neighborhoods, let alone real hard facts on crime, available online. I did find a great website put together by a realtor specializing in Metro Denver that has a wealth of information about Denver neighborhoods, and crime statistics for metro Denver and surrounding suburbs.
But, based on their data for 2005, our modest neighborhood finished a distant 42nd out of the 78 neighborhoods listed, in terms of "number of incidents" (crimes). What neighborhoods of note had more "incidents" than Cole's 532 in 2005?
- Ritzy (and expensive) South Park Hill (560)
- Always en vogue Washington Park (611)
- Much more desirable West Highland (668) and Berkely (677)
- Cherry Creek (yes, Cherry Creek) (808)
- Everyone's talking about Stapleton... (884)
- And our hold 'hood, where we couldn't afford to buy a house: Highland proper (983)
Does this tell us anything really? Well, I say that it supports the assertion that crime happens everywhere, including in fancy, affluent Cherry Creek.
One might also hypothesize that the crimes committed in Cherry Creek are largely theft and burglary (If I was a thief, that's where I would prowl) and potentially more violent in Cole; and unfortunately for us there is data to support that assertion. Cole had one homicide in 2005 compared to Cherry Creek's zero, but easily outpaced Cherry Creek in terms of "aggravated assault" 46 to 4. Cole lost the contest for burglaries 97 to 199.
But does it surprise anyone that Cole doesn't compare favorably with Cherry Creek when it comes to crime? I mean, we're talking about the richest, snootiest section of town compared to a transitional, poverty-stricken urban neigborhood in the thick of gentrification. What about the Highlands, where we used to live, and which was much like Cole even five years ago?
Well, in terms of its total number of incidents, it ranks #10 on the list, not an admirable achievement. What about the specific nature of the crimes? Highland matched Cole's one homicide and eclipsed us in terms of assaults (60) and burglaries (122). Keep in mind that when we were house-hunting there a year or so ago, you couldn't find an 800 square foot townhome there for under $200,000.
Does this data make me feel any better about that young man getting shot in our neighborhood last week? Of course not. If anything, I find the data sobering, in that even when this neighborhood turns the corner like "better" neighborhoods Highlands, West Highland, Berkley, etc., we'll still have significant problems to deal with.
The only thing that gives me hope is the knowledge that there are an increasing number of people in Cole committed to turning it around, and an equally, if not more-committed police force.
While thus far I haven't been able to find any crime data for the calendar year 2006 as a whole, I found one article showing that at least mid-way through 2006, crime was down 7.4% in Denver (After publishing this post, I heard a report on 9news stating that the numbers are in, crime was down 10% in Denver for 2006 as a whole). I'm also ready to do jumping jacks and cartwheels, as the Denver Police Department is about to unleash the Broken Windows program on the bad guys in our neighborhood. While some "experts" question the program's effectiveness, pointing out potential flaws in the perceived success the NYPD enjoyed after implementing a similar program, I'm all for the increased police presence. And knowing the high caliber officers we have in District 2, I think they're really going to make a difference.
And we're committed to sticking it out in Cole, and doing what small part we can to support the continued redevelopment and regenesis of the neighborhood. It won't bring Gilbert back, but hopefully we can make his home someplace beautiful again.
Thanks for reading.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
A tiny bit of progress
I attended my first Cole Neighborhood Association Meeting last Thursday in almost a year. I had begun boycotting the meetings after my first, when it became clear that the only thing the attendees thought was an issue in the 'hood was gentrification.
Not crime, pollution or gangs, just finding a way to stop all the white people from moving in and driving property values up (by cleaning up the neighborhood, mind you). What trend do you think is more troubling--Violent crime, or raising property values?
I always knew that I should give it another try, and am ashamed it took me this long.
But there I was, at the meeting the other night, not knowing what to expect, but expecting the worst.
The truth? I was pleasantly surprised that rather being in the minority this time, we were in the majority. And by "we" I mean responsible residents that bought a home in this neighborhood as an investment, and as such know that the only way this investment is going to pay off is for the neighborhood to improve.
And by "we" I mean people that know that in order for the neighborhood to improve, there is a definite crime problem that needs to be addressed, and that it takes an aggressive police presence to get that done.
Last meeting, a woman actually stood up and said "This is a great neighborhood, we don't need such a police presence". This time I heard several residents stand up and talk about their own problem houses on their blocks that were perpetuating the history of drugs, violence and theft that this "great neighborhood" had become known for in the past.
I was thrilled as well that several police officers from District 2 in Denver attended the meeting. Both because I appreciate their efforts on our behalf tremendously, and enjoyed the opportunity to shake their hands and say thanks. Also, because I know they stopped coming to the neighborhood association meetings in the past because they grew tired of the perpetual "cop-bashing" sessions the meetings often deteriorated into. This time they were greeted by a majority of attendees that were sincere in their appreciation for their efforts, and that were committed to doing their part to help the police continue to clean up this neighborhood.
After hearing of the problems some residents were having just a few blocks away from our home, I realized this was going to be a long process improving the neighborhood and pushing the problem individuals out. But with cooperation between realistic, reasonable residents like are beginning to get involved, and the police department, I believe we can do it.
Thanks for reading.
Not crime, pollution or gangs, just finding a way to stop all the white people from moving in and driving property values up (by cleaning up the neighborhood, mind you). What trend do you think is more troubling--Violent crime, or raising property values?
I always knew that I should give it another try, and am ashamed it took me this long.
But there I was, at the meeting the other night, not knowing what to expect, but expecting the worst.
The truth? I was pleasantly surprised that rather being in the minority this time, we were in the majority. And by "we" I mean responsible residents that bought a home in this neighborhood as an investment, and as such know that the only way this investment is going to pay off is for the neighborhood to improve.
And by "we" I mean people that know that in order for the neighborhood to improve, there is a definite crime problem that needs to be addressed, and that it takes an aggressive police presence to get that done.
Last meeting, a woman actually stood up and said "This is a great neighborhood, we don't need such a police presence". This time I heard several residents stand up and talk about their own problem houses on their blocks that were perpetuating the history of drugs, violence and theft that this "great neighborhood" had become known for in the past.
I was thrilled as well that several police officers from District 2 in Denver attended the meeting. Both because I appreciate their efforts on our behalf tremendously, and enjoyed the opportunity to shake their hands and say thanks. Also, because I know they stopped coming to the neighborhood association meetings in the past because they grew tired of the perpetual "cop-bashing" sessions the meetings often deteriorated into. This time they were greeted by a majority of attendees that were sincere in their appreciation for their efforts, and that were committed to doing their part to help the police continue to clean up this neighborhood.
After hearing of the problems some residents were having just a few blocks away from our home, I realized this was going to be a long process improving the neighborhood and pushing the problem individuals out. But with cooperation between realistic, reasonable residents like are beginning to get involved, and the police department, I believe we can do it.
Thanks for reading.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)